R25 and Queensland Police Service [2020] QICmr 50 (15 September 2020)

Application Number
314850
Applicant
R25
Respondent
Queensland Police Service
Decision Date
Tuesday, Sep 15, 2020
Catchwords

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - RIGHT TO INFORMATION - REFUSAL OF ACCESS - DOCUMENT NONEXISTENT OR UNLOCATABLE - applicant contends additional documents exist - whether the information sought is nonexistent or unlocatable - section 67(1) of the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) and sections 47(3)(e) and 52(1) of the Right to Information Act 2009 (Qld)

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - RIGHT TO INFORMATION - IRRELEVANT INFORMATION - whether deleted information is irrelevant to the terms of the access application - section 88 of the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld)

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - RIGHT TO INFORMATION - REFUSAL OF ACCESS - EXEMPT INFORMATION - LAW ENFORCEMENT OR PUBLIC SAFETY INFORMATION - documents relating to the applicant and her interactions with the agency - whether disclosure could reasonably be expected to prejudice a system or procedure for the protection of persons, property or the environment - sections 47(3)(a), 48 and schedule 3, section 10(1)(i) of the Right to Information Act 2009 (Qld)

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - RIGHT TO INFORMATION - REFUSAL OF ACCESS - EXEMPT INFORMATION - LAW ENFORCEMENT OR PUBLIC SAFETY INFORMATION - documents relating to the applicant and her interactions with the agency - whether information was obtained, used or prepared for an investigation by a prescribed crime body or another agency in performance of the prescribed functions of the prescribed crime body - sections 47(3)(a), 48 and schedule 3, section 10(4) of the Right to Information Act 2009 (Qld)

Appeals and judicial review

Decisions of the Information Commissioner can be subject to appeal and judicial review.
For matters under appeal, contact the appropriate jurisdiction directly.