Guidelines
-
Guidelines
- Keyword Search
- Browse guidelines for government
- Browse information sheets for community
- A-Z listings
- Search Results
Search again
Search results
Displaying search results 2,991 - 3,000 of 5,230 for
2,991 Application of Section 27(3) and (4) FOI Act
Application of Section 27(3) and (4) FOI Act. Relevant considerations. 1. Is it reasonable to consider that the deleted matter is not relevant to the terms of the application? The ordinary meaning of 'relevant' applies.. 1. In considering whether
2,992 Key published decisions applying Section 27(3) and (4) FOI Act
Key published decisions applying Section 27(3) and (4) FOI Act. O80PCE and Department of Education and Training (Unreported, Queensland Information Commissioner, 15 February 2010). The applicant sought access to documents relating to a departmental
2,993 Relevance to the RTI Act
Relevance to the RTI Act. Under section 47(3)(e) of the RTI Act, access may be refused to a document that is nonexistent or unlocatable as mentioned in section 52 of the RTI Act. There are no substantive changes from section 28A of the repealed FOI
2,994 Overview of Section 28A FOI Act
Overview of Section 28A FOI Act. Section summary. Under section 28A of the FOI Act, access may be refused to a document that does not exist or cannot be located. A document will be nonexistent or unlocatable under section 28A of the FOI Act if the
2,995 Application of Section 28A FOI Act
Application of Section 28A FOI Act. Relevant considerations. 1. Refusal of access under section 28A(1) of the FOI Act, where the document does not exist. a) Is the agency or Minister satisfied the document does not exist? Access to a document may be
2,996 Key published decisions applying Section 28A FOI Act
Key published decisions applying Section 28A FOI Act. PDE and University of Queensland (Unreported, Queensland Information Commissioner, 9 February 2009). The applicant sought access to a 'results form' of a specified course at the University of
2,997 Relevant decisions from other jurisdictions
Relevant decisions from other jurisdictions. Chu v Telstra Corp Ltd [2005] FCA 1730. The Information Commissioner referred to this decision in PDE. This decision concerns the application of the equivalent Commonwealth provision. Relevantly, section
2,998 Relevance to the RTI Act
Relevance to the RTI Act. Section 41(1) of the RTI Act replicates section 29(1) of the FOI Act with no substantive changes. Section 42 of the RTI Act sets out procedural requirements that must be met before an agency or Minister can refuse to deal
2,999 Overview of Section 29(1) FOI Act
Overview of Section 29(1) FOI Act. Section summary. An agency or Minister may refuse to deal with an application if they consider doing so would substantially and unreasonably:. divert the agency's resources from the performance of its functions; or.
3,000 Application of Section 29(1) FOI Act
Application of Section 29(1) FOI Act. Relevant considerations. 1. What is the work involved in dealing with the application or applications? In deciding whether to refuse to deal with an application under section 29(1) of the FOI Act, the agency or
