Demo training page

The applicant sought review of a decision by the respondent to refuse him access to an 'Agreement for Compromise' entered into between two companies in settlement of legal proceedings between them in the Tribunal.  The respondent claimed that the Agreement was exempt under s.46(1) of the FOI Act.  The parties to the Agreement claimed that it was exempt under s.44(1), s.45(1)(c), s.46(1)(a) and s.46(1)(b) of the FOI Act.

This is heading 1

The Information Commissioner found that the companies were not capable of having personal affairs for the purposes of s.44(1), and that, in relation to the directors of the companies, the matter in issue which concerned them was properly characterised as information concerning their business affairs, rather than their personal affairs.  The Information Commissioner found that the Agreement was not exempt under s.44(1) of the FOI Act.  The Information

Heading 2

Commissioner accepted that there were segments of the Agreement which were properly characterised as information concerning the business, commercial or financial affairs of the companies; however, the Information Commissioner was not satisfied that disclosure of the Agreement could reasonably be expected to have an adverse effect on those affairs.  The Information Commissioner therefore found that the Agreement was not exempt under s.45(1)(c) of the FOI Act.

Promo Title

Abstract Text Sub Title

The Information Commissioner found that the companies were not capable of having personal affairs for the purposes of s.44(1), and that, in relation to the directors of the companies, the matter in

Link

I will add padding top here to this paragraph. No need to add spacer hack