This guideline explains how to give an applicant access to documents under the Right to Information Act 2009 (Qld) (RTI Act), including the impact of third party copyright and when an agency can turn electronic information into a written document.
An applicant has 40 business days to access the documents, unless the agency1 agrees to extend this time.2 The 40 business days starts the business day after:
Before the applicant can be given access to the documents, they must pay any outstanding processing and/or access charges.6
An agency can send the documents with the decision notice if there are no fees or charges owing and there is no deferred access period yet to expire.
If the documents are not being sent with the decision notice, the agency must tell the applicant the period within which the applicant may access them7 and explain how to do so. If access is deferred to any documents, that must be explained in the decision notice.
Once the applicant seeks access, the agency should give them the documents as soon as possible.8
If access to the document is being given by way of download from a weblink (usually emailed to the applicant) the link must be active for at least 40 business days (or the relevant access period). If the link expires before the end of the access period then a new active link must be sent to the applicant (unless they advise they have accessed the documents).
If the applicant does not access the documents within the access period, their right of access expires, although the agency does have the discretion to extend this timeframe.9
If an agency agrees to give access to a document, or part of a document, to a participant in an external review, the agency is authorised to give that access, and the external review continues as if the review did not apply in relation to the document or part.10
How can an agency give access?
Under the RTI Act, access to documents may be given in the way the applicant requests11, unless it would:
The RTI Act includes a non-exhaustive list14 of ways access can be given, including:
An agency may give access to a document in another form agreed to by the applicant.15
For information in a document that is irrelevant to an application, an agency may delete this information from a copy of the document before giving the applicant access, but only if the agency considers that it is reasonably practicable to do so.16
See Deletion of irrelevant information for further information.
Never remove information from original documents. Copies must always be made of the original documents and the information removed from the copies.
Where an agency decides to refuse access to exempt information, contrary to the public interest information, contrary to child’s best interests information, or relevant healthcare information, the agency must delete this information from a copy of the document before the applicant is given access.17
These documents are not post-application documents18 because their creation is specifically authorised by the RTI Act.
Where information only exists electronically, such as in a database, an agency can create a written document from the electronic information to give access to it.19 The agency can only use tools which are usually available to it to create the written document.
Generally, the agency should only create a written document out of information which is in scope of the application. Methods of creating the written document will depend on the tools available to the agency but could include exporting to a spreadsheet or taking a screen capture.
Transcription of sounds, shorthand, or code
Where an agency has documents where words are recorded in the form of shorthand, code, or sound, the agency can produce a written transcript of the words to give access.20
Applicants can be given access to electronic copies (e.g., PDFs of documents provided by email, CD, USB or downloadable from a weblink) or hardcopies. Hardcopies may be given in the form of, for example, printouts, photocopies, large scale maps, building plans, or x-rays.
Applicants can choose access by inspection or inspection may be the only form of access available, for example, where the document is subject to third party copyright. Documents must be redacted to remove exempt, irrelevant, or contrary to the public interest information before the applicant inspects them.
An applicant must be given a ‘reasonable opportunity’ to inspect the documents. What is reasonable will depend on the circumstances. An agency should consider the applicant's access to transport and any difficulties involved in travelling to the agency. It may be appropriate to send the documents to a branch of the agency closer to the applicant to facilitate inspection.
A ‘reasonable opportunity’ may also mean allowing the applicant to inspect the documents over several days, particularly if there are a large number of documents.
Depending on the contents of the documents, agencies may wish to consider supervising applicants during inspection.
If a document is an audio or video document21, such as a phone recording or CCTV, the agency can arrange for the applicant to hear or view it, with any irrelevant, exempt, or contrary to the public interest information removed.
If the agency does not have the appropriate equipment to facilitate the access, it will have to borrow or hire it.22
See Managing access to digital video recordings for more information about removing exempt or contrary to the public interest information from, and providing access to, digital and audio recordings.
Most agencies use software such as Redax, a plug-in for Adobe Acrobat, or similar programs, which enable users to:
Electronic copies can then be provided to the applicant in PDF format. However, it is important to ensure that extra steps are taken to prevent the document being altered or manipulated. For example, PDF documents can be password protected in Adobe Acrobat to prevent them from being altered.
While redaction is primarily done through electronic means, if an agency needs to redact information from a hardcopy document, it is important the redaction is made to a copy of the original document. The redaction should be made with a method that completely obscures the information. The final copy must be carefully checked to ensure the information has been entirely removed.
When information is deleted from documents, a notation should be made to identify the section under which it was removed. For example, the copies could be marked: ‘deleted: exempt information under section 48 RTI Act’ or ‘deleted: contrary to the public interest under section 49 RTI Act’ as appropriate.
It is recommended that documents released under the RTI Act be watermarked to indicate this. Agencies using Redax or similar software can insert the watermark across the electronic files. Where the document is not a written document, for example a CD or x-ray, the access copy can still be labelled or otherwise marked to indicate RTI release.
The RTI Act provides that if giving access in the form requested by the applicant (e.g., copies) would breach the copyright of someone other than the State of Queensland, the agency can refuse that form of access and give access in a different, non-infringing form.23 It is not the role of RTI decision makers to interpret contractual arrangements and make complex determinations regarding copyright, but because copyright can impact the available forms of access, they need to be aware of copyright and make relevant inquiries as needed.
Determining if copyright applies to some or all of the documents24 requires a consideration of whether copyright subsists in the documents and, if so, whether it would be infringed by the agency making copies for release under the RTI Act. In Australia, copyright is governed by the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). The Commissioner discussed the application of this Act to providing access under the RTI Act in V11 and Brisbane City Council25 and Mt Cooth-tha Local Residents and Brisbane City Council.26 Decision makers should refer to those decisions for guidance on determining if documents are subject to copyright.
If a decision maker decides to give access by way of inspection because providing copies would infringe copyright, they should ensure appropriate conditions are in place during inspection, for example, by ensuring there is adequate supervision, to prevent copying or reproduction of the copyright document.27
Current as at: July 1, 2025