This information sheet will assist people who have been consulted by a Queensland government agency about releasing information under the Right to Information Act 2009 (Qld) (RTI Act) or the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) (IP Act). It will also assist people who have been consulted by the Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC) as part of an external review.
The RTI Act , which replaced the Freedom of Information Act 1992 (Qld), requires Queensland government agencies1 to release information to applicants unless there is a good reason not to. Anyone (including a company) can apply to access government documents.
Under the RTI Act2, an agency has to take all reasonable steps to consult with a third party when:
OIC, as part of conducting external reviews of agency decision, may also consult with third parties, including with people who were not initially consulted by the agency.
You are only being consulted about two things:
Your views are not being sought about any other matter relating to the application and you can only provide your views on documents you were actually consulted on. If you provide your views on other issues or documents, for example the scope of the application or whether information is irrelevant, the RTI Act does not require the agency to take them into account.3
Under the RTI Act, if an agency should have consulted you but did not, you can seek a review of the failure to consult. If you have reasonable grounds to believe that the agency holds documents that would be of concern to you that you have not been consulted on, you should discuss this with the decision maker. You may not have been consulted because the agency is not considering releasing those documents.
If you believe there are documents being released that you were not consulted on, you have the right to seek a review of the decision. It is important to exercise these review rights as quickly as possible, before documents are actually released.
In some circumstances, the identity of the applicant may impact your views about whether it is contrary to the public interest to release the documents; in others, it will be irrelevant. If the agency is not able to tell you the applicant’s identity they should be able to tell you what sort of applicant they are, for example, whether they are a member of a community group, a concerned citizen, or a member of the media.
If you are consulted by OIC during an external review, the identity of the applicant may form part of the review process.
The agency will give you a reasonable opportunity to respond to the consultation, based on your circumstances and the complexity of the information. If you have concerns about the timeframe given, raise them with the agency as soon as possible.
You must tell the agency that you object to the disclosure and, where possible, this should be communicated in writing. Your objection should set out the information you think should not be released and your reasons why, detailing the exempt information provisions or public interest factors you think are relevant.
Information is exempt if it falls into one of the categories listed in Schedule 3 of the RTI Act. This includes information which is confidential, legally privileged, or could endanger a law enforcement investigation. OIC has a number of guidelines which discuss exempt information.
Information which is not exempt is subject to the public interest balancing test. This is where an agency identifies relevant public interest factors for and against disclosure and balances them to decide whether it would be contrary to the public interest to release the information. The public interest factors are listed in Schedule 4 of the RTI Act.
See the What is the Public Interest guideline for more information.
The Council consults with you on a complaint letter you sent in about your neighbour’s fence. You believe the letter is private because it has your personal opinions and details in it. If you object to its disclosure, you could refer to the public interest factors that relate to privacy, such as schedule 4, part 3, item 3 and part 4, item 6.
You are not required to advise the agency if you don’t object to the information being released, but it may assist the decision maker if you let them know.
If you have no objections to the disclosure of the information, the agency decision maker will proceed to make a decision in accordance with the RTI Act. It is unlikely that you will be contacted again.
The agency4 will consider your views and any objections you raised and take them into account when making their decision (unless your views fall within one or more of the RTI Act’s irrelevant factors).
If the agency decides not to release information you objected to they will give the applicant a decision stating that the agency has refused access to the information. The agency may also notify you of the decision. The applicant will then have 20 business days to seek a review of the decision to refuse access.
If the agency decides to release information contrary to your views, the agency will give you a decision notice with reasons for the decision and your review rights. Note that, even though the agency has decided to release information over your objections, the applicant will not actually be given a copy at this stage.
Access to those documents you objected to will be deferred until the time for you to exercise your review rights has passed.
Yes, you can apply for a review of the decision to release documents contrary to your objection. You must do so within 20 business days from the date of the decision notice. If you do not lodge a review application within the 20 business days the agency can give the documents to the applicant.
You also have 20 business days to apply for a review if you believe the agency should have consulted you on a document and they did not. You should do so as quickly as possible, however, to ensure documents of concern are not released before you exercise your review rights.
Please see Explaining your review rights – a guide for applicants for more information.
Some documents released under the RTI Act can be published on the agency’s website as part of their Disclosure Log.6 Not all information will be included, for example information that would unreasonably intrude on an individual’s privacy must not be included in an agency’s Disclosure Log.
Current as at: May 15, 2017