ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – RIGHT TO INFORMATION – REFUSAL TO DEAL WITH APPLICATIONS – information subject of earlier access application and completed external review – whether the Information Commissioner should decide not to further deal with part of external review application concerning information previously dealt with under section 94(1)(a) of the Right to Information Act 2009 (Qld)
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – RIGHT TO INFORMATION - SCOPE OF APPLICATION – application for access to information –information falling outside the scope of the access application
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – RIGHT TO INFORMATION – REFUSAL OF ACCESS – EXEMPT INFORMATION – LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE – whether information is exempt on the basis of legal professional privilege under schedule 3, section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2009 (Qld) - whether access may be refused under sections 47(3)(a) and 48 of the Right to Information Act 2009 (Qld)
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – RIGHT TO INFORMATION – REFUSAL OF ACCESS – CONTRARY TO PUBLIC INTEREST INFORMATION – access refused to information about other individuals – personal information and privacy – business, commercial, financial affairs – whether disclosure would, on balance, be contrary to public interest – whether access may be refused under sections 47(3)(b) and 49 of the Right to Information Act 2009 (Qld)
1. The applicant applied1 to the Department of Communities (Communities) under the Right to Information Act 2009 (Qld) (RTI Act) for ‘the complete file’ concerning a specified residential unit then owned by Communities. The applicant was a public housing tenant of the unit at the time she made her application.
2. Communities did not make a decision within the timeframe prescribed in the RTI Act. Under section 46(1) of the RTI Act, Communities was therefore taken to have made a decision refusing access to the requested information (Deemed Refusal).
3. The applicant applied2 to the Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC) for external review of the Deemed Refusal.
4. OIC did not determine substantive issues arising from the applicant’s external review application, but decided3 not to further deal with that application, in accordance with section 94(1)(a) of the RTI Act (Original Decision).
5. The applicant appealed OIC’s Original Decision to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT). By order dated 23 October 2014,4 QCAT set aside the Original Decision and remitted the matter to OIC to be dealt with according to the provisions of the RTI Act.
6. OIC reopened the external review and I have considered the matter afresh. A considerable amount of information in issue at the outset of the review has been released to the applicant. As for the balance, I have decided:
7. The period between OIC’s Original Decision and this decision has seen various machinery of government changes. The respondent agency is now the Department of Housing and Public Works (HPW).
8. Significant procedural steps are set out in Appendix 1 to these reasons.
9. The decision under review is the Deemed Refusal taken to have been made on 31 March 2011.5
10. The evidence, submissions, legislation and other material I have considered in reaching this decision are disclosed in these reasons (including footnotes and appendices).
11. HPW identified 2444 pages relevant to the applicant’s access application. HPW agreed to release a considerable number of these pages to the applicant during the course of this review, in full or part. Released information is not in issue. The information that remains in issue is identified in Appendix 2.
12. Despite the release of information noted above, there still remains a large volume of information in issue in this review. Given this, I have adopted a degree of generalisation in these reasons. This is in keeping with the approach to voluminous applications endorsed by Woodward J of the Federal Court of Australia in News Corporation Ltd & Ors v National Companies and Securities Commission,6 His Honour observing that: ‘… if the Freedom of Information legislation is to remain workable, it must be open to a respondent, and to the AAT [and by extension OIC, as the relevant agency of independent review], to deal with large numbers of documents with a degree of generalization appropriate to the case.’7
13. The applicant requested8 that she be provided with any agency submissions lodged with OIC. Exercising the discretion under 95(1)(a) of the RTI Act, I have declined to do so, in order that participants may focus on issues salient to the review, to ensure compliance with section 108 of the RTI Act, and to endeavour to resolve this matter as expeditiously as possible.9 I have nevertheless ensured that the applicant has been advised of any preliminary view I have formed in the course of the review, where such view has been adverse to her interests, and apprised her of the material on which I have based such a view. I am satisfied that the applicant has been afforded procedural fairness in the circumstances of this review.
14. By letter dated 9 February 2017, I wrote to the applicant conveying my preliminary view on the issues in this external review, and inviting her to make submissions in reply by 9 March 2017. I also advised in this letter that OIC would be prepared to allow any reasonable request for extra time, should the applicant require it.
15. By letter dated 21 February 2017, the applicant requested until 6 April 2017 to lodge submissions. I replied the same day, allowing the applicant the additional time she had requested.
16. The applicant subsequently lodged her submissions with OIC on 5 April 2017. Those submissions raise a number of complaints and issues about the external review process, and the past processing of related applications made by her to OIC. Accordingly, not all of these submissions are relevant to the present review and it is often difficult to determine which parts are directly relevant to the issues I am required to decide.
17. One part of the applicant’s 5 April 2017 submissions could, however, arguably be construed as a contention that OIC has not afforded the applicant enough time to prepare an adequate reply to my letter dated 9 February 2017. If so, this does not reflect my having allowed the applicant a month to reply to my 9 February 2017 letter and advising her of my preparedness to entertain requests for additional time, and immediately acceding to such a request when it was made in her 21 February 2017 letter. It would also seem to be contradicted by the statement later in the applicant’s 5 April 2017 submissions that she was ‘…not going to waste any more time regarding this submission…’.
18. The applicant’s 5 April 2017 submissions also raise the length of time taken to progress this review. I recognise that the review process has been lengthy. However, I am confident that OIC has progressed this matter in as timely a manner as possible, in view of the volume of documents in issue in both this review and the applicant’s related reviews (many of which were released to the applicant through the course of these reviews, as a consequence of the external review process), and the fact that this application was one of many competing for the allocation of the finite resources available to OIC for the purposes of resolving external review applications.
19. I am satisfied that I have allowed the applicant adequate time – and/or the opportunity of adequate time – to put her case in this review.
20. The applicant’s 5 April 2017 submissions further contain various complaints as to OIC’s procedure in this review, including alleged ‘failure to consult’ and lack of procedural fairness, apparently stemming from the imposition by OIC of deadlines for replying to correspondence. In reply, it is sufficient to note that the procedure to be adopted on an external review is at OIC’s discretion.10 OIC is obliged to afford participants procedural fairness, and I am satisfied that this has been done in the circumstances of this case, and reject the suggestion that the imposition of timeframes on parties of itself amounts to a denial of natural justice, particularly in circumstances where, as here, such timeframes were open to negotiation.
21. Additionally, the applicant’s 5 April 2017 submissions contain an insistence that previous submissions made by her in related external reviews remitted by order of QCAT and since finalised by OIC ‘…are to be included in their entirety in this submission’. It is important to note that the applicant lodged an extensive amount of material in the course of all matters, including those earlier reviews, a considerable proportion of which is directed to matters having no bearing on the substantive issues to be determined in this particular review. These submissions are often discursive, and generally difficult to comprehend. Nevertheless, I have endeavoured to have regard to such material, to the extent it bears on any of the issues I am required to determine in this case.
22. Two such matters canvassed in earlier submissions are wholly procedural complaints, concerning the file or matter numbers used by OIC in identifying this and related reviews on their remittal from QCAT, and OIC’s dealing with each of those remitted matters individually, rather than jointly. Each is adequately addressed in my decision in Underwood and Minister; the first, at paragraphs [13]-[17], the second, at [20]-[21]. I do not propose to extend this lengthy set of reasons by furthering engaging with what are peripheral issues, and simply adopt relevant reasoning from that earlier decision to the extent it may be necessary to do so. For the purposes of this decision, it is sufficient to note that there is no substance to any complaint about file numbering, and nothing precluding OIC from dealing with each remitted matter separately.
23. I will now address the substantive issues arising in this review.
24. As in Underwood (No. 1) and Underwood (No. 2), a considerable number of the pages in issue in this review are duplicates or counterpart copies of documents dealt with previously under the RTI Act, as a result of an RTI access application made by the applicant to HPW dated 28 February 2011 and OIC’s external review of HPW’s decision on that access application. That earlier review – review no. 310671 – was finalised by way of formal decision: Underwood and Department of Housing and Public Works (Underwood).11 The schedule forming Appendix 2 to this decision cross-references pages in issue in this review against corresponding pages dealt with in review no. 310671.
25. Further, a number of pages partly disclosed to the applicant contain the names of private sector employees and a Tenants’ Union of Queensland employee, each of which has been deleted from the copies disclosed to the applicant.12 It was decided in Underwood that disclosure of these names would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.13
26. For the reasons explained below, I decide not to deal with, or not to further deal with, the applicant’s external review application in this review, to the extent it concerns ‘repeat’ information (Repeat Information) of the kind described in paragraphs 24 and 25 above.
27. Section 94(1)(a) of the RTI Act provides:
(1) The information commissioner may decide not to deal with, or not to further deal with, all or part of an external review application if—
(a) the commissioner is satisfied the application, or the part of the application, is frivolous, vexatious, misconceived or lacking substance…
28. The power prescribed in section 94(1)(a) of the RTI Act is applicable to the extent an external review applicant seeks information that has been dealt with under the RTI Act in the course of prior applications by that applicant.14 As the Deputy Information Commissioner has stated, an application of this kind:15
…would clearly be vexatious, and contrary to the principle that a decision by a court or tribunal resolves the issues in dispute between the parties. A litigant cannot seek multiple hearings of the same issues between parties - that is vexatious and oppressive to the other party and to the relevant court or tribunal, and unfair to other citizens waiting their turn to use the dispute resolution services, provided from public funds, by courts and tribunals.
29. Applying the above reasoning, to the extent that the applicant’s external review application seeks to revisit information and issues dealt with previously under the RTI Act, I consider that it is frivolous, vexatious, misconceived or lacking in substance. Accordingly, I decide not to deal with, or not to further deal with that aspect of the applicant’s application under section 94(1)(a) of the RTI Act, and therefore not to deal with, or not to further deal with, the Repeat Information, ie:
30. In forming this view, I have, as I did in Underwood (No. 1), taken into account the fact that some of the documents with which I have decided not to deal16 – generally, counterpart emails as appearing in the ‘mailboxes’ of multiple recipients, or subsets of larger email chains – vary slightly from the corresponding documents dealt with pursuant to the applicant’s access application ultimately the subject of review no. 310671. They relay, however, the same information and/or embody the same communication, differing only in insignificant and superficial respects.17 To the extent the applicant’s review application seeks to press for access to such inconsequential information, I consider it frivolous.18 Further reviewing the decision under review as it relates to information and documents of this kind would – in view of the fact that the status of the substantive information they embody has been analysed and associated right of access questions previously resolved – constitute a repeat hearing of issues already determined. In the circumstances, it is my view that proceeding further in relation to such information would be ‘vexatious and oppressive to the other party and to the relevant court or tribunal, and unfair to other citizens waiting their turn to use’ OIC’s publicly-funded services.
31. I should also note that in making the finding stated in paragraph 29, I recognise that the access application ultimately the subject of the present external review was made to Communities, whereas the access application leading to external review no. 310671 was made to HPW. I do not consider this renders external review no. 310671 irrelevant for present purposes,19 nor precludes me from exercising the discretion conferred by section 94(1)(a) of the RTI Act. As I explained in Underwood (No. 1) (footnotes omitted):
26. HPW was, at the time the applicant made the access applications noted in the preceding paragraph, providing legal services to Communities. Communities sought HPW’s assistance in dealing with various issues concerning the applicant’s tenancy – HPW was, in practical terms, Communities’ ‘in-house’ legal advisor. Documents and information dealt with in the Concluded Review [ie, external review no. 310671] therefore essentially came from the legal files maintained by HPW in assisting Communities.
27. The Repeat Information in issue in this review comprises the ‘flip side of the coin’; the same information, as created or received by Communities in seeking HPW’s assistance. Duplicates and/or the substance of a considerable amount of the Repeat Information was, as discussed above, released to the applicant pursuant to her access application dated 28 February 2011 as lodged with HPW and through the Concluded Review that resulted. While I have not conducted an exhaustive re-examination of the issues determined in the Concluded Review, I have satisfied myself that where information was refused in that earlier and completed review, it was refused on grounds that would apply regardless of which agency held the documents.
28. It is also important to note that I am required to consider relevant facts and circumstances as they now stand, and as a result of machinery of government changes, the documents in issue in this review are HPW documents, and have been for some time. HPW was, by the time of the remitting order of Cullinane J, the relevant respondent in QCAT proceedings APL075-12. HPW is the respondent in this external review, is the agency that has collated and assessed all relevant information in response to the access application the subject of this review, and is the agency with whom OIC has conducted all meaningful liaison as regards refusal of access and disclosure. HPW is, in short, the respondent agency that did all the ‘legwork’ in the Concluded Review, and has done so again in response to the access and external review applications the subject of my review.
29. In summary, my view is that revisiting information and issues determined pursuant to the access and external review applications the subject of the Concluded Review would involve a further hearing of issues otherwise finally determined as between the applicant and HPW, the agency now responsible for relevant documents and for prosecuting a case in relation to same in this external review. This would give rise to a result that would be vexatious and oppressive to OIC, by requiring it to reconsider the same information and issues previously determined and resolved. Revisiting relevant issues would, I think it fair to conclude, also be unreasonable as regards HPW, by necessitating that it deal again in this review with matters resolved in the Concluded Review. Further, re-considering the Repeat Information may adversely impact other external review applicants seeking to avail themselves of OIC’s finite, and publicly funded, resources.
32. The circumstances concerning the Repeat Information in issue in this review are on ‘all fours’ with those relating to equivalent information analysed in the passages from Underwood (No. 1) extracted above. The above observations and findings are therefore equally applicable, and I adopt them for the purposes of this decision.20
33. In an annexure to her access application, the applicant stated that she sought access to information ‘…excepting that already provided under previous applications …IP0029/R0247 of 27 November 2009 and/or to be provided under application R0602 of 13 September 2010…’.
34. A number of the pages in issue were previously released to the applicant pursuant to the applications referred to in the preceding paragraph. Accordingly, as information ‘already provided under’ applications R0247 and/or R0602, relevant pages21 fall within the exception expressly stated by the applicant in her access application. As she is not seeking access to these pages, they are therefore outside the scope of her access application and may be excluded from consideration in this external review.
35. Some other pages identified by HPW22 are entirely unrelated to the subject of the applicant’s access application, and thus do not fall within its terms. They are outside the scope of the application and of this external review, and may also be excluded from further consideration.
36. The RTI Act gives people a right to access documents of government agencies.23 This right is subject to other provisions of the RTI Act, including grounds on which access may be refused. Access may be refused to information, to the extent the information comprises ‘exempt information’.24‘Exempt information’ includes information that would be privileged from production in a legal proceeding on the ground of legal professional privilege.25
37. Legal professional privilege (LPP) attaches to confidential communications between a lawyer and client made for the dominant purpose of seeking or giving legal advice or professional legal assistance, or preparing for, or for use in or in relation to, existing or reasonably anticipated legal proceedings.26
38. The privilege extends to copies of unprivileged documents made for the dominant purpose of obtaining legal advice27 and to internal communications repeating legal advice, whether verbatim or in substance.28
39. Relevant information – the ‘Legal Information’ – is noted in Appendix 2. It generally comprises communications between Communities officers and Communities’ legal service providers as employed by HPW,29 and communications with Crown Law solicitors. These communications were made for the purposes of both advising on the management of the applicant’s tenancy, and dealing with proceedings in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) arising as a consequence of that tenancy. Relevant pages (or parts of pages) generally consist of emails (including attachments) between Communities staff, HPW lawyers and Crown Law solicitors, conveying instructions, and requesting or providing legal advice (including internal agency communications forwarding, repeating or reiterating the substance of such legal advice). While some of the pages comprising the Legal Information may also include copies of documents that may not of themselves attract legal professional privilege, I am satisfied that relevant copies are privileged, as copies made for the dominant purpose of seeking or obtaining legal advice or obtaining material for use in litigation.
40. I am satisfied that the Legal Information was created for the dominant purpose of obtaining professional legal assistance from independent legal advisors, for conveying that assistance, or for obtaining material for use in actual litigation.30 There is nothing before me to suggest that it is anything other than confidential. It therefore attracts LPP.
41. The Legal Information is exempt information, to which access may be refused under sections 47(3)(a) and 48 of the RTI Act.
42. A further ground for refusing access to information under the RTI Act is where disclosure of the information would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest.31 In deciding whether disclosure would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest, the RTI Act requires a decision-maker to:
43. Schedule 4 of the RTI Act contains non-exhaustive lists of various factors that may be relevant in determining the balance of the public interest. I have carefully considered these lists, together with the applicant’s submissions in this and related reviews,33 in reaching my decision in this review.
44. There are four main categories of contrary to public interest information (CTPI Information) in issue in this review, as follows:
45. Appendix 2 references CTPI Information according to the above categories.
46. I can identify no applicable irrelevant factors, and I have taken none into account in making my decision. I will now consider whether the balance of the public interest favours disclosure or nondisclosure of the CTPI Information.
47. As explained further below, much of the CTPI Information comprises the personal information of individuals other than the applicant. The RTI Act presumes that disclosure of personal information of this kind could reasonably be expected to give rise to a public interest harm.34 ‘Personal information’ is:35
information or an opinion, including information or an opinion forming part of a database, whether true or not, and whether recorded in a material form or not, about an individual whose identity is apparent, or can reasonably be ascertained, from the information or opinion.
48. Additionally, disclosure of much of the CTPI Information could, for reasons elaborated further below, reasonably be expected to prejudice protection of an individual’s right to privacy. This gives rise to a factor favouring nondisclosure.36 The concept of ‘privacy’ is not defined in the RTI Act. It can, however, be viewed as the right of an individual to preserve their personal sphere free from interference from others.37
49. Some of the CTPI Information comprises mobile telephone numbers of public servants. Having carefully considered the applicant’s submissions and closely scrutinised the list of factors favouring disclosure in the public interest set out schedule 4, part 2 of the RTI Act, I can identify just the one consideration favouring disclosure of this information: the general public interest in promoting public access to government-held information.38 I cannot see how disclosure of such limited and particular personal contact details could, for example, promote open discussion of public affairs,39 contribute to positive and informed debate on important issues or matters of serious interest,40 or contribute to innovation and the facilitation of research.41
50. Further, I am unable to ascertain how any of the public interest submissions raised in the applicant’s various submissions could be meaningfully applied to the mobile telephone numbers of public servants.
51. I can, firstly, identify no objective evidence in any of the material before me of an ‘abuse of power’ or a ‘criminal conspiracy’ as asserted by the applicant in her application for external review, or of ‘retaliation’ or interference as alleged in her submissions dated 5 April 2017, and nothing whatsoever to support any claim that disclosure of any of the CTPI Information – ie, Categories 1-4 – could reasonably be expected to reveal or substantiate such claims.42
52. Nor can I identify any evidence to suggest that the mobile telephone numbers comprising the Category 1 information are, for example, incorrect, misleading, irrelevant, or that they have been ‘fabricated’.43 There is, further, nothing before me to explain how mere contact numbers could be said to be ‘perpetuating and compounding one’s persecution and prolific defamation’44 at all, let alone in a fashion so as to merit disclosure.
53. Additionally, it cannot be said that refusing the applicant access to this information means she is being ‘denied’ the opportunity to have it amended, as asserted at paragraph 2 of the submissions annexed to her review application and raised again in her 5 April 2017 submissions. The right to amend information contained in section 41 of the IP Act only applies to an individual’s own personal information, which these numbers are plainly not.
54. As for factors favouring nondisclosure, it is convenient here to refer to paragraphs 63-72 of my decision in Underwood and Minister, where I dealt with equivalent information. As I explained in that decision:
66. A factor favouring nondisclosure arises where disclosure of information could reasonably be expected to prejudice the protection of an individual’s right to privacy. OIC has previously found that disclosure of the mobile telephone numbers of public officers could reasonably be expected to lead to this prejudice. This is because such information allows officers to be contacted directly and outside of work hours. As the Assistant Information Commissioner has noted:
I acknowledge that agency employees are provided with mobile telephones to perform work associated with their employment. However, I also consider that a mobile telephone number which allows an individual to be contacted directly and potentially outside of working hours, falls outside the realm of routine work information and attracts a certain level of privacy.
67. I agree. As I have noted, disclosure of mobile telephone numbers permits potential contact with a public officer when off duty and/or engaged in private activity, thus giving rise to a reasonable expectation of intrusion into…the officer’s private life or ‘personal sphere’. (Footnotes omitted.45)
55. I adopt the above reasoning for the purposes of this case. Disclosure of the mobile telephone numbers in issue could reasonably be expected to prejudice the protection of associated individuals’ right to privacy, giving rise to a factor favouring nondisclosure.46
56. Prior to concluding discussion of this nondisclosure factor, I should note submissions made by the applicant in one of the earlier related reviews47 which, while not expressly put by her again in this review, might be argued to be relevant in view of her request as noted in paragraph 21. The essence of these submissions – and their lack of merit – was captured by the Assistant Information Commissioner in Underwood (No. 2):
61. … the applicant appears to contest the application of this [the prejudice protection of privacy] nondisclosure factor, arguing that ‘[p]ublic service officers and/or others are not entitled to claim privacy when my privacy is not considered’. From her submissions, it appears the applicant may have taken umbrage at circulation of issues concerning her public tenancy amongst various officials with responsibility for community and public housing. There is no objective material before me, however, to suggest that such activity was anything other than ordinary, everyday administrative practice – certainly, outside the applicant’s various assertions and allegations, there is nothing in the information before me to suggest her ‘privacy’ has not been ‘considered.’
62. In any event, the applicant’s contentions are strictly irrelevant to an application of the privacy nondisclosure factor. The factor arises for consideration in balancing the public interest where, as noted, disclosure of specific information could reasonably be expected to prejudice protection of an individual’s right to privacy – its operation is not contingent on another’s privacy having also been given due regard. (Footnotes omitted.)
57. Inosfar as I may be obliged to in this matter, I agree with and adopt the reasoning of the Assistant Information Commissioner as set out above. The privacy nondisclosure factor in schedule 4, part 3, item 3 of the RTI Act applies to the Category 1 information.
58. I turn then to balance relevant factors against one another. I give the general consideration favouring disclosure identified in paragraph 49 moderate weight, noting that there are no broader accountability or transparency issues standing to be advanced by disclosure of public servant mobile telephone numbers.
59. Weighing against disclosure is the public interest in avoiding prejudice to the protection of an individual’s right to privacy. There is a clear public interest in ensuring that government respects personal privacy, including the privacy of its employees. I accord this consideration significant weight.
60. Balancing relevant factors against one another, I consider the significant public interest in safeguarding individual privacy outweighs the general public interest in promoting access to government-held information. As the Assistant Information Commissioner observed in Underwood (No 2):
…government is the custodian of a mass of information relating to the community, and the general public interest in promoting access to information it holds will often conflict with and, generally, yield to specific public interests, such as the public interest in protecting personal privacy. This is such a case.
61. This, too, is such a case. Disclosure of the public servant mobile numbers in issue would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest. For the reasons explained above, access may be refused to the Category 1 information.48
62. The information in issue includes various documents relating to the management of the body corporate for the unit complex in which the applicant formerly resided. Some of these documents contain contrary to public interest information, generally:
a) names and identifying particulars49 of private lot owners/occupants and information disclosing their dealings with their properties, such as the manner in which those owners voted on body corporate matters
b) financial information concerning amounts payable by lot owners and the body corporate representing those owners
c) names and personal particulars50 of employees of private entities, such as the strata title management company engaged to manage the body corporate and its contractors; and
d) financial and operational information concerning the strata management company’s fees and services and contractors to the body corporate.
(a)-(b) Lot owner names/financial information
63. As with the Category 1 information, I have carefully considered the information comprising Categories 2(a)-(b), the applicant’s submissions, and the list of factors favouring disclosure set out in schedule 4, part 2 of the RTI Act. Again, the only consideration that I can identify operating to favour disclosure of these latter categories of information is the general public interest in promoting community access to government-held information.
64. There is nothing at all before me to suggest that any of this purely factual information concerning private individuals is ‘fabricated’, and/or incorrect, out of date, misleading etc, and therefore no basis on which to reasonably conclude that its disclosure would reveal same so as to enliven schedule 4, part 2, item 12 of the RTI Act.51 Nor is there anything to suggest that release of these categories might serve to advance public interest considerations such as enhancing government accountability,52 contributing to positive and informed debate on important issues or matters of serious interest,53 or contributing to the maintenance of peace and order.54
65. Additionally, as with the Category 1 information, I am unable to ascertain how release of what is relatively routine body corporate information could assist the applicant in redressing any alleged ‘persecution and prolific defamation’ whatsoever, let alone to a degree warranting disclosure.
66. As for weighting, given the nature of the information comprising Categories 2(a)-(b) – private information concerning the personal and financial affairs of members of the general public, in the possession of government as an incidental consequence of its participation in the residential property market – the sole consideration favouring disclosure as identified in paragraph 63 warrants marginal weight.
67. Counting against disclosure is the fact that the Categories 2(a)-(b) information comprises the personal information of individual proprietors of units in the relevant complex,55 and/or information disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to prejudice the protection of those proprietors’ right to privacy. I am satisfied that an individual’s ownership of residential property, their intentions as regards the management of such property, and the financial liabilities attending ownership, all comprise information falling within their ‘personal sphere’. Given the nature of relevant information, these two considerations – the personal information public interest harm factor,56 and the privacy nondisclosure factor57 – each warrant substantial weight.
68. Balancing relevant factors against one another, I am satisfied that the disclosure of Categories 2(a)-(b) would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest. The general public interest in promoting access to government-held information, a consideration which, as noted, attracts only marginal weight in this case, should in my view be subordinated to the substantial public interest in safeguarding personal information and protecting individual privacy.
69. Accordingly, access to Categories 2(a)-(b) may be refused under section 47(3)(b) of the RTI Act.
(c) Employee names and personal particulars
70. Once again, having given all relevant material due consideration,58 the only consideration favouring disclosure of this category of information that I can identify is the general public interest in advancing access to government-held information.59 For reasons similar to those discussed above at paragraph 66, I accord this consideration marginal weight.
71. As for factors favouring nondisclosure, OIC has previously found60 that the fact that an individual works for a private sector business is their personal information, giving rise to the public interest harm factor favouring nondisclosure61 and the related public interest nondisclosure factor intended to avoid prejudice to the protection of individual privacy.62 Applying that earlier reasoning, I am satisfied that each of these factors applies to the equivalent information in issue in the present case, disclosure of which would both identify individuals and link those individuals to their private employment.63
72. As regards the weight to be accorded the factors telling against disclosure, there is, in my view, a manifest and self-evident public interest in ensuring that government protects personal information and the privacy of private citizens. Accordingly, I am satisfied that each factor attracts substantial weight.
73. To balancing, and the marginally-weighted general public interest in furthering community access to government-held information is in my view insufficient to displace the substantial public interests in protecting against prejudice to other individuals’ privacy and safeguarding personal information held by government. Accordingly, disclosure of relevant names and related information would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest, and access to this information may be refused under section 47(3)(b) of the RTI Act.
d) Strata management company fee/services information
74. This information discloses fees payable by the body corporate of the unit complex in which the applicant was formerly housed to both:
75. This category also includes particulars of the strata company’s service arrangements.
76. Once again, the general public interest in advancing access to government-held information operates to favour disclosure of this category of information. Given the nature of this information, however – information concerning the business affairs of private entities, in government possession as an incidental result of the latter’s investment in the private real estate market – I afford that consideration only minor weight.
77. I also acknowledge that agencies are accountable for decisions to appoint and remunerate private contractors in relation to real property held by government, and recognise the public interest in disclosing information concerning government dealings with public housing properties, so as to ensure and enhance transparency and accountability of government expenditure and operations.64
78. Communities was, however, one lot owner in a multi-unit complex, and therefore only partly responsible for decisions to engage and remunerate relevant contractors – diluting considerably relevant accountability and transparency interests. I am therefore of the view that applicable pro-disclosure factors warrant only marginal weight.
79. For reasons analogous to those explained above, and having reviewed all relevant material,65 I can identify no other factors or considerations favouring disclosure of this category of information.66
80. On the other hand, I am of the view that there are several factors favouring nondisclosure of this information.
81. Strata management and maintenance contracting are competitive industries. By revealing fees received, ‘price-points’ at which services are offered, and contracting quotes, disclosure could, in my view, reasonably be expected to assist competitors to compete with relevant entities more effectively in the strata management and maintenance contracting markets generally.
82. In the circumstances, I consider that disclosure of this category of information could reasonably be expected to prejudice relevant entities’ business, commercial or financial affairs,67 and to cause a public interest harm, by having an adverse effect on those affairs.68 There is a legitimate public interest in ensuring that the affairs of private businesses are not unduly impacted or prejudiced by the mere fact that their information comes into the possession of government, via, as in this case, government participation in the private residential property market.
83. I acknowledge, however, that this information is now relatively aged, arguably diminishing its commercial sensitivity somewhat. In the circumstances, I afford the nondisclosure considerations discussed in the preceding paragraph moderate weight.
84. Balancing relevant factors against one another, my view is that the factors favouring disclosure are, when weighed against the factors favouring nondisclosure, insufficient to tip the balance of the public interest in favour of disclosure. I therefore find that disclosure of the Category 2(d) information would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest.
85. Accordingly, access to Category 2(d) may be refused, under section 47(3)(b) of the RTI Act.
86. The Category 3 information comprises information the disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to identify individuals other than the applicant, in a context concerning relevant individuals’ complaints or approaches to Communities, interactions with Communities (including proposed interactions), and Communities’ dealings with these individuals and their information. It includes information describing individual attitudes and opinions and personal and financial intentions, and information connecting individuals with assertions as to personal conduct.
87. I recognise the public interest in disclosing information that may assist to ensure public agencies operate transparently and accountably, and acknowledge that disclosure of these segments may, in some cases, assist the applicant to be fully apprised of issues concerning her tenancy, and Communities’ management of same, arguably enlivening public interest factors set out in schedule 4, part 2, items 1, 3, and 11 of the RTI Act.
88. I consider, however, that applicable pro-disclosure public interests have been adequately served by disclosure to the applicant of information concerning relevant issues, and that she has been provided with sufficient information to allow her to understand those issues and Communities’ handling of those matters. These pro-disclosure considerations therefore warrant a moderate weighting.
89. I also note that, as information concerning her tenancy, it is arguable that some of this information also comprises the applicant’s personal information, giving rise to the factor favouring disclosure prescribed in schedule 4, part 2, item 7 of the RTI Act. This is an important public interest, warranting considerable weight. It is not possible, however, to separate this personal information from what, as I discuss further below, is the personal information of others. Disclosing it would therefore require disclosure of the personal information of persons other than the applicant, and would, as also discussed further below, prejudice protection of an individual’s right to privacy.
90. As for factors favouring nondisclosure, as identifying information,69 the Category 3 information comprises personal information of persons other than the applicant, giving rise to the public interest harm factor telling against disclosure.70 It is also my view that information of this kind concerns the private aspects of an individual’s life, and that disclosure could therefore reasonably be expected to prejudice protection of their right to privacy.71 Each deserves substantial weight.
91. Turning to the balancing exercise required of me, my view is that the substantially-weighted factors favouring nondisclosure outweigh all considerations operating in favour of disclosure of the Category 3 information. I am not persuaded that disclosure of the Category 3 information would materially advance the pro-disclosure public interest factors I have identified above; certainly, not to an extent sufficient to justify disclosure of the personal information of persons other than the applicant which this information comprises. As regards the fact that some information might be said to comprise the applicant’s own personal information, taking into account all relevant circumstances, it is my view that the strong public interest in safeguarding personal information and avoiding prejudice to the protection of privacy of third parties should, in this case, be preferred to that favouring disclosure to an individual of their own personal information.
92. It is important here that I discuss in some depth the applicant’s submissions72 that information may be ‘fabricated’, and ‘inaccurate, misleading and/or irrelevant’. As noted above, a factor favouring disclosure of information will arise for balancing where disclosure of information could reasonably be expected to reveal that the information is incorrect, out of date, misleading, gratuitous, unfairly subjective or irrelevant.73 As OIC observed in dealing with equivalent information in earlier related reviews,74 there is, however, nothing before me to suggest that relevant information is incorrect, out of date, misleading, irrelevant etc. Much of it is merely factual matter – such as names – which clearly present as accurate and correct. As for more substantive ‘complaint’ information, OIC has found that this type of information:
… is by its very nature, an individual’s particular version of events which is shaped by factors including the individual’s memory and subjective impressions.
In my view, this inherent subjectivity does not necessarily mean that the resulting account or statement is incorrect, out of date, misleading, gratuitous, unfairly subjective or irrelevant. Rather, it means that complaint information comprises a personal interpretation of relevant events, which an investigator must balance against other (often competing) statements and evidence in reaching a conclusion in a particular case.75
93. As in earlier matters, I agree with the above analysis, and am of the view that the relevant factor favouring disclosure does not arise for consideration in this case.76
94. Nor does this appear, in my view, to be a case in which procedural fairness considerations or considerations concerning the administration of justice might arise to favour disclosure. This is because the substance of any matters potentially adverse to the applicant have either been disclosed to her pursuant to related RTI access applications, or in the course of this review.
95. For the sake of completeness, and bearing in mind once more the applicant’s contention that I ought to have regard to all earlier arguments and submissions raised by her in other related reviews, I note that in Underwood (No. 2), the Assistant Information Commissioner addressed a submission77 that the applicant was ‘being denied the right to have my side of the neighbourhood dispute placed on record.’ To the extent I may be obliged to deal with this submission, I rely on the reasoning78 of the Assistant Information Commissioner:
It is not, in my view, necessary for the applicant to access third party personal information (nor any other information to which I have decided access may be refused) in order for her to put her ‘side’ of the dispute; indeed, the voluminous amount of correspondence lodged by her with Communities/HPW in relation to relevant ‘neighbourhood’ issues suggests she has not only enjoyed such a right, but exercised it vigorously. (Footnotes omitted.)
96. In the circumstances, I consider that the public interest in protecting privacy and safeguarding personal information should be preferred to any considerations favouring disclosure of the Category 3 information. As I recorded in refusing access to analogous information in Underwood (No. 1) (footnotes omitted):79
Members of the public are generally entitled to expect that personal information collected from them by government agencies will be handled appropriately, and not subject to routine and unconditional disclosure to others. Safeguarding individual privacy and avoiding public interest harm by protecting personal information are public interest considerations warranting relatively substantial weight, and which outweigh any considerations favouring disclosure in this case.
97. Disclosure of the Category 3 information would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest. Access to this information may therefore be refused under section 47(3)(b) of the RTI Act.
98. The Category 4 information comprises the responses of public officers to complaints made by the applicant, and ancillary information generated during the course of a formal complaint investigation process arising from those complaints.
99. There is nothing before me to suggest that any information in this category is incorrect, misleading etc, and thus no basis to contemplate schedule 4, part 2, item 12 of the RTI Act in balancing the public interest. Insofar as this information comprises subjective opinion and impression, it is of a piece with the information discussed in paragraphs [92]-[93], and the reasoning and findings set out there apply. Apart from the general public interest in promoting access to government-held information (which, as regards this Category, I attribute only moderate weight, given its nature as information concerning individual employees), I can identify no other considerations or factors favouring disclosure of the Category 4 information, beyond those discussed in this and the following two paragraphs.
100. I acknowledge the public interest in enhancing the accountability of agencies for the manner in which they investigate and resolve complaints against staff, and the transparency of the complaints management process. I also recognise that disclosure may reveal some of the background or contextual information relied on by Communities in dealing with the applicant’s complaint.80 I understand that Communities did, however, provide the applicant with a detailed account of its investigation and findings,81 which, coupled with information disclosed to her to date through this and her various other RTI applications in my view largely satisfies relevant transparency and accountability interests. Relevant accountability and transparency considerations therefore warrant only moderate weight.
101. I also recognise that, as information generated in direct response to complaints levelled by the applicant, some of this information comprises her personal information,82 an important public interest consideration deserving of not-insignificant weight. However, this information is, as discussed further below, the personal information of persons other than the applicant. Disclosing it would, therefore, entail disclosure to the applicant of the personal information of other individuals. As outlined below, the information is relatively sensitive in nature. Bearing this in mind – and the fact that Communities gave the applicant a substantial account of the investigation process and its outcome – my view is that considerations favouring disclosure are not of sufficient weight to override the considerations favouring nondisclosure identified and discussed below.
102. Turning then to factors favouring nondisclosure, as identifying information and opinion, this information comprises the personal information of relevant officers, disclosure of which would therefore give rise to a public interest harm.83 I also consider that disclosure of at least some of it – revealing as it would information going beyond mere routine work information, including individuals’ emotional states, and personal feelings and opinions about, and impressions of, relevant events – would unjustifiably intrude into the ‘personal sphere’ of relevant individuals, and thus prejudice protection of these officers’ right to privacy.84 These considerations deserve significant weight, particularly in view of the fact that relevant complaints were, as I understand, found to be largely unsubstantiated.
103. Further, I consider that disclosure of any of this Category 4 information could reasonably be expected to prejudice HPW’s (and Communities’) management functions.85 The information discloses, as I have noted, personal feelings and emotions of particular officers, and includes frank observations and opinions concerning internal workplace relationships, all made in the context of a formal investigation process. I consider that release of such information could reasonably be expected to undermine staff confidence in agency investigation processes and – by revealing personal attitudes, opinions and feelings – adversely affect staff morale, thereby impairing the agency’s ability to manage staff. I give this consideration substantial weight.
104. As alluded to in paragraph 101, on balancing all relevant considerations against one another, I am of the view that factors and considerations favouring disclosure of the Category 4 information are insufficient to displace the significant and substantial public interest considerations favouring nondisclosure. Disclosure of this information would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest, and access to it may therefore be refused under section 47(3)(b) of the RTI Act.
105. I acknowledge that the applicant may be aware of a considerable amount of information concerning identities and events to which parts of the CTPI Information relate, as a consequence of information released to her pursuant to various RTI access applications and of her intimate involvement in events to which relevant segments contained in that information pertain. In these circumstances, it is arguable that the privacy interests attaching to some of the personal information embodied in the CTPI Information may not be of the same magnitude as might ordinarily be the case.
106. Despite this, members of the community are, as I have noted above, entitled to expect that their personal information as held by a government agency will not be subject to unconditional disclosure to others. In the circumstances, my view is that relevant factors favouring nondisclosure discussed above retain sufficient weight so as to justify refusal of access.
107. I would also stress that, if I were wrong in finding that some or all of the factors favouring disclosure canvassed above do not arise to be weighed in this case, I would give each low weight, and consider that the balance of the public interest would nevertheless remain in favour of nondisclosure of all of the CTPI Information in this case.
108. As a final matter, I should record that in my letter to the applicant dated 9 February 2017, I advised that I could identify nothing in the information before me to support the unsubstantiated assertion raised in paragraph 6 of the annexure to her application for external review that she was being ‘denied access to documents not made available due to an insufficiency of search’.
109. I further informed the applicant that in the absence of objective evidence supporting this claim, I did not propose to deal with relevant submissions any further.
110. The applicant has in her responses to my letter provided no such evidence that I can identify. There being no other probative material before me to support these claims, I pay them no further regard.86
111. I set aside the Deemed Refusal under review. In its place, I decide not to further deal with the applicant’s application for external review under section 94(1)(a) of the RTI Act, insofar as it seeks to revisit the Repeat Information. I further find that:
112. I have made this decision as a delegate of the Information Commissioner, under section 145 of the RTI Act.
Clare Smith
Right to Information Commissioner
Date: 20 April 2017
External review 310595 | |
---|---|
Date | Event |
2 December 2010 | Communities received the access application under the RTI Act. |
31 March 2011 | Communities did not make a decision within the relevant timeframe and the principal officer of Communities was taken to have refused access to the requested information under section 46(1) of the RTI Act. |
4 April 2011 | Communities notified the applicant of the deemed decision taken to have been made under section 46(1) of the RTI Act. |
5 April 2011 | OIC received the application for external review of the deemed decision. |
20 June 2011 | OIC received submissions from the applicant. |
23 November 2011 | OIC issued a preliminary view to the applicant and invited her to provide submissions in support of her case if she did not accept the preliminary view. |
8 December 2011 | OIC received the applicant’s submissions in response to the preliminary view. |
9 February 2012 | OIC decided not to further deal with the applicant’s external review application, finalising external review no. 310595. |
External review 100105 (remitted matter 310595) | |
Date | Event |
23 October 2014 | QCAT set aside OIC’s decision dated 9 February 2012, and remitted the matter to OIC. OIC opened review no. 100105. |
24 December 2014 | OIC asked HPW to provide submissions. |
13 January 2015 | OIC advised the applicant it had opened file no. 100105 (remitted matter 310595). |
22 January 2015, 3 March 2015 | HPW requested and was granted by OIC extensions of time in which to provide its submissions. |
19 March 2015 | OIC updated the applicant on progress in the review. |
31 March 2015 | HPW provided requested submissions. |
30 April 2015 | HPW advised OIC it wished to amend its submissions. |
5 May 2015 | OIC acknowledged HPW’s request to amend its submissions, and requested advice as to when amendments might be complete. |
7 May 2015 | OIC updated the applicant on the status of the review. |
13, 14 May 2015 | HPW advised OIC as to an estimated date for amending its submissions. |
14 May 2015 | OIC wrote to the applicant, advising of the status of the review and requesting the applicant confirm that she wished to proceed with the review. |
25 May 2015 | The applicant confirmed she wished to proceed with the review. |
29 May 2015 | OIC received amended submissions from HPW. |
21 July 2015 | OIC requested HPW release information to the applicant. |
23 July 2015 | HPW advised OIC of its preparedness to release information, as requested by OIC. |
10 September 2015, 10 November 2015 | OIC updated the applicant on the status of the review. |
3 December 2015 | OIC issued a preliminary view to HPW as to the status of the information in issue and requested HPW’s position in reply by 11 January 2016. |
9 December 2015 | OIC requested HPW defer supplying its reply to OIC’s 3 December 2015 preliminary view, pending OIC’s re-assessment of that preliminary view. |
18 February 2016 | OIC issued a revised preliminary view to HPW, requesting a reply by 31 March 2016. |
31 March 2016 | HPW requested additional time to reply to OIC’s revised preliminary view, to 29 April 2016. |
1 April 2016 | OIC approved HPW’s request for additional time. |
28 April 2016 | HPW made a further request for additional time to reply to OIC’s revised preliminary view, to 27 May 2016. OIC approved HPW’s request for additional time. |
18 May 2016 | OIC received HPW’s reply to OIC’s revised preliminary view |
28 June 2016 | OIC wrote to HPW in reply to HPW’s 18 May 2016 correspondence, requesting advice by 12 July 2016. |
4 July 2016 | HPW sought clarification of issues raised in OIC’s 28 June 2016 correspondence, and seeking confirmation of an extension of time to reply to that correspondence to 26 July 2016. |
7 July 2016 | OIC confirmed HPW’s requested extension of time, to 26 July 2016, in which to reply to OIC’s 18 May 2016 correspondence. |
12 July 2016 | OIC further clarified with HPW issues raised in OIC’s 28 June 2016 correspondence. HPW sought and received an extension of time to 11 August 2016 to reply to that letter. |
18 August 2016 | OIC received HPW’s reply (dated 12 August 2016). OIC wrote to the applicant concerning the status of the review. |
6 September 2016 | The applicant wrote to OIC concerning procedural issues. |
8 September 2016 | OIC replied to the applicant’s 6 September 2016 letter. OIC wrote to HPW, concerning the status of the information in issue and aspects of HPW’s treatment of same. |
9 September 2016 | HPW replied to OIC’s 8 September 2016 letter. |
13 September 2016 | OIC wrote to HPW, concerning the status of the information in issue. |
15 September 2016 | HPW replied to OIC’s 13 September 2016 letter. OIC wrote to HPW, requesting review and confirmation of information remaining in issue by 20 September 2016. |
16 September 2016 | HPW requested an extension until 5 October 2016 to reply to OIC’s 15 September 2016 letter. |
19 September 2016 | OIC allowed the extension requested by HPW. |
5 October 2016 | HPW requested further time, to 11 November 2016, to reply to OIC’s 15 September 2016 letter. |
6 October 2016 | OIC allowed the extension requested by HPW. OIC wrote to the applicant concerning the status of the review. |
17 November 2016 | HPW requested further time, to 24 February 2017, to reply to OIC’s 15 September 2016 letter. |
21 November 2016 | OIC allowed HPW to 27 January 2017 to provide its reply. |
3 January 2017 | OIC received HPW’s reply to OIC’s 15 September 2016 letter. |
9 February 2017 | OIC issued a preliminary view to the applicant that OIC intended not to deal further with part of her external review application, and that access may be refused to other information. OIC invited the applicant to provide submissions in support of her case. OIC requested HPW arrange for disclosure to the applicant of information to which it had agreed to grant access. |
21 February 2017 | The applicant requested an extension of time to reply to OIC’s preliminary view. OIC granted the extension of time requested by the applicant. |
5 April 2017 | OIC received the applicant’s submissions in reply to OIC’s 9 February 2017 preliminary view. |
Page | 310671 page no. (where relevant) | Decision |
---|---|---|
1 | Released - not in issue | |
2 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
3 | Segments 1-2: CTPI (Category 3) | |
4 |
Segments 1-2, 8, 10, 15, 16, 19-21: CTPI (Category 3) Balance: 94(1)(a) (name) | |
5 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
6 | Released - not in issue | |
7 | Part exempt: Legal Professional Privilege (LPP) | |
8 | Released - not in issue | |
9 | Released - not in issue | |
10 | Released - not in issue | |
11 | Released - not in issue | |
12 | Released - not in issue | |
13 | Released - not in issue | |
14 | 664-5 | 94(1)(a) |
15 | 665-6 | 94(1)(a) |
16 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
17 | 574, 663 | 94(1)(a) |
18 | 575, 663 | 94(1)(a) |
19 | 728 | 94(1)(a) |
20 | 729 | 94(1)(a) |
21 | 739 | 94(1)(a) |
22 | 740 | 94(1)(a) |
23 | 741 | 94(1)(a) |
24 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
25 | Released - not in issue | |
26 | 691 | 94(1)(a) |
27 | 692 | 94(1)(a) |
28 | 693 | 94(1)(a) |
29 | 694 | 94(1)(a) |
30 | 695 | 94(1)(a) |
31 | 677, 695 | 94(1)(a) |
32 | 677, 696 | 94(1)(a) |
33 | 678, 697 | 94(1)(a) |
34 | 678, 698 | 94(1)(a) |
35 | 679, 699 | 94(1)(a) |
36 | 679, 700 | 94(1)(a) |
37 | 680, 701 | 94(1)(a) |
38 | 680, 702 | 94(1)(a) |
39 | 681, 703 | 94(1)(a) |
40 | 681, 704 | 94(1)(a) |
41 | 682, 705 | 94(1)(a) |
42 | 682, 706 | 94(1)(a) |
43 | 683, 707 | 94(1)(a) |
44 | 668-9 | 94(1)(a) |
45 | 670, 708 | 94(1)(a) |
46 | 670, 709 | 94(1)(a) |
47 | 671, 710 | 94(1)(a) |
48 | 671, 711 | 94(1)(a) |
49 | 672, 712 | 94(1)(a) |
50 | 672, 713 | 94(1)(a) |
51 | 673, 714 | 94(1)(a) |
52 | 673, 715 | 94(1)(a) |
53 | 674, 716 | 94(1)(a) |
54 | 674, 717 | 94(1)(a) |
55 | 675, 718 | 94(1)(a) |
56 | Released - not in issue | |
57 | Released - not in issue | |
58 | Released - not in issue | |
59 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
60 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
61 | Released - not in issue | |
62 | Released - not in issue | |
63 | Released - not in issue | |
64 | Released - not in issue | |
65 | Released - not in issue | |
66 | Released - not in issue | |
67 | Released - not in issue | |
68 | Released - not in issue | |
69 | Released - not in issue | |
70 | Released - not in issue | |
71 | Released - not in issue | |
72 | Released - not in issue | |
73 | Released - not in issue | |
74 | Released - not in issue | |
75 | Released - not in issue | |
76 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
77 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
78 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
79 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
80 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
81 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
82 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
83 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
84 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
85 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
86 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
87 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
88 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
89 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
90 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
91 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
92 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
93 | Released - not in issue | |
94 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
95 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
96 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
97 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
98 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
99 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
100 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
101 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
102 | Released - not in issue | |
103 | Released - not in issue | |
104 | Released - not in issue | |
105 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
106 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
107 | Released - not in issue | |
108 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
109 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
110 | Released - not in issue | |
111 | Released - not in issue | |
112 | Released - not in issue | |
113 | Released - not in issue | |
114 | Released - not in issue | |
115 | Part CTPI (Category 2(c)) | |
116 | Part CTPI (Category 2(c)) | |
117 | Released - not in issue | |
118 | Part CTPI (Category 2(a)) | |
119 |
Segment 1: CTPI (Category 3) Balance: CTPI (Category 2(c)) | |
120 | Released - not in issue | |
121 | Released - not in issue | |
122 | Released - not in issue | |
123 | Released - not in issue | |
124 | Released - not in issue | |
125 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
126 | Released - not in issue | |
127 | Released - not in issue | |
128 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
129 | Released - not in issue | |
130 | Released - not in issue | |
131 |
Segments 2-3: Exempt (LPP) Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
132 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
133 | Released - not in issue | |
134 | Released - not in issue | |
135 | Released - not in issue | |
136 |
Segments 2-3: Exempt (LPP) Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
137 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
138 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
139 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
140 | Released - not in issue | |
141 | Released - not in issue | |
142 | Released - not in issue | |
143 | Released - not in issue | |
144 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
145 | Released - not in issue | |
146 | Released - not in issue | |
147 | Released - not in issue | |
148 | Released - not in issue | |
149 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
150 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
151 | Released - not in issue | |
152 | Prior release, not sought by applicant: R0602 File03 24-28 | |
153 | Prior release, not sought by applicant: R0602 File03 24-28 | |
154 | Prior release, not sought by applicant: R0602 File03 24-28 | |
155 | Prior release, not sought by applicant: R0602 File03 24-28 | |
156 | Prior release, not sought by applicant: R0602 File03 24-28 | |
157 | Prior release, not sought by applicant: R0247 File01 additional documents 7-13 | |
158 | Prior release, not sought by applicant: R0247 File01 additional documents 7-13 | |
159 | Prior release, not sought by applicant: R0247 File01 additional documents 7-13 | |
160 | Prior release, not sought by applicant: R0247 File01 additional documents 7-13 | |
161 | Prior release, not sought by applicant: R0247 File01 additional documents 7-13 | |
162 | Prior release, not sought by applicant: R0247 File01 additional documents 7-13 | |
163 | Prior release, not sought by applicant: R0247 File01 additional documents 7-13 | |
164 | Released - not in issue | |
165 | Released - not in issue | |
166 | Released - not in issue | |
167 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
168 | Released - not in issue | |
169 |
Segments 7-8: CTPI (Category 3) Balance: 94(1)(a) (name) | |
170 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
171 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
172 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
173 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
174 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
175 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
176 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
177 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
178 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
179 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
180 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
181 | Exempt: LPP | |
182 | Exempt: LPP | |
183 | Exempt: LPP | |
184 | Exempt: LPP | |
185 | Exempt: LPP | |
186 | Exempt: LPP | |
187 | Exempt: LPP | |
188 | Exempt: LPP | |
189 | Exempt: LPP | |
190 | Exempt: LPP | |
191 | Exempt: LPP | |
192 | Exempt: LPP | |
193 | Exempt: LPP | |
194 | Exempt: LPP | |
195 | Exempt: LPP | |
196 | Exempt: LPP | |
197 | Exempt: LPP | |
198 | Exempt: LPP | |
199 | Exempt: LPP | |
200 | Exempt: LPP | |
201 | Exempt: LPP | |
202 | Exempt: LPP | |
203 | Exempt: LPP | |
204 | Exempt: LPP | |
205 | Exempt: LPP | |
206 | Exempt: LPP | |
207 | Exempt: LPP | |
208 | Exempt: LPP | |
209 | Exempt: LPP | |
210 | Exempt: LPP | |
211 | Exempt: LPP | |
212 | Exempt: LPP | |
213 | Exempt: LPP | |
214 | Exempt: LPP | |
215 | Exempt: LPP | |
216 | Exempt: LPP | |
217 | Exempt: LPP | |
218 | Exempt: LPP | |
219 | Exempt: LPP | |
220 | Exempt: LPP | |
221 | Exempt: LPP | |
222 | Exempt: LPP | |
223 | Exempt: LPP | |
224 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
225 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
226 | 727 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) |
227 | 728 | 94(1)(a) |
228 | 729 | 94(1)(a) |
229 | Released - not in issue | |
230 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
231 |
Segments 1-2: 94(1)(a) (name) Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
232 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
233 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
234 | 574, 663 | 94(1)(a) |
235 | 575, 663 | 94(1)(a) |
236 | 664-5 | 94(1)(a) |
237 | 665-6 | 94(1)(a) |
238 | Part exempt: LPP | |
239 | Released - not in issue | |
240 | Released - not in issue | |
241 | Released - not in issue | |
242 | Released - not in issue | |
243 | Released - not in issue | |
244 | Released - not in issue | |
245 | Exempt: LPP | |
246 | Exempt: LPP | |
247 | Released - not in issue | |
248 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
249 | Released - not in issue | |
250 | 730 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) |
251 | Released - not in issue | |
252 | 574, 663 | 94(1)(a) |
253 | 575, 663 | 94(1)(a) |
254 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
255 | Released - not in issue | |
256 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
257 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
258 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
259 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
260 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
261 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
262 | 739 |
Segment 1: LPP Segment 2: 94(1)(a) |
263 | 740 | 94(1)(a) |
264 | 741 | 94(1)(a) |
265 | 742 | 94(1)(a) |
266 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
267 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
268 | Released - not in issue | |
269 | Exempt: LPP | |
270 | Exempt: LPP | |
271 | Exempt: LPP | |
272 | Exempt: LPP | |
273 | 592 | 94(1)(a) |
274 | 593 | 94(1)(a) |
275 | 594 | 94(1)(a) |
276 | 595 | 94(1)(a) |
277 | 596 | 94(1)(a) |
278 | 596 | 94(1)(a) |
279 | 597 | 94(1)(a) |
280 | 623 | 94(1)(a) |
281 | 624 | 94(1)(a) |
282 | 625 | 94(1)(a) |
283 | 626 | 94(1)(a) |
284 | 627 | 94(1)(a) |
285 | Exempt: LPP | |
286 | Exempt: LPP | |
287 | Exempt: LPP | |
288 | Exempt: LPP | |
289 | Exempt: LPP | |
290 | Exempt: LPP | |
291 | Exempt: LPP | |
292 | Exempt: LPP | |
293 | Exempt: LPP | |
294 | Exempt: LPP | |
295 | Exempt: LPP | |
296 | Exempt: LPP | |
297 | Exempt: LPP | |
298 | Exempt: LPP | |
299 | Exempt: LPP | |
300 | Exempt: LPP | |
301 | Exempt: LPP | |
302 | Exempt: LPP | |
303 | Exempt: LPP | |
304 | 611 | 94(1)(a) |
305 | 612 | 94(1)(a) |
306 | 613 | 94(1)(a) |
307 | 614 | 94(1)(a) |
308 | 615 | 94(1)(a) |
309 | 616 | 94(1)(a) |
310 | 617 | 94(1)(a) |
311 | N/A | 94(1)(a) |
312 | Exempt: LPP | |
313 | Exempt: LPP | |
314 | Exempt: LPP | |
315 | Exempt: LPP | |
316 | Exempt: LPP | |
317 | Exempt: LPP | |
318 | Exempt: LPP | |
319 | Exempt: LPP | |
320 | Exempt: LPP | |
321 | Exempt: LPP | |
322 | Exempt: LPP | |
323 | Exempt: LPP | |
324 | Exempt: LPP | |
325 | Exempt: LPP | |
326 | Exempt: LPP | |
327 | Exempt: LPP | |
328 | Exempt: LPP | |
329 | Exempt: LPP | |
330 | 599 | 94(1)(a) |
331 | 600 | 94(1)(a) |
332 | 601 | 94(1)(a) |
333 | 602 | 94(1)(a) |
334 | 603 | 94(1)(a) |
335 | 604 | 94(1)(a) |
336 | 605 | 94(1)(a) |
337 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
338 | Released - not in issue | |
339 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
340 | Released - not in issue | |
341 | Exempt: LPP | |
342 | Exempt: LPP | |
343 | 551, 561, 580 | 94(1)(a) |
344 | 552, 562, 581 | 94(1)(a) |
345 | 553, 563, 582 | 94(1)(a) |
346 | 554, 564, 583 | 94(1)(a) |
347 | 555, 565, 584 | 94(1)(a) |
348 | 556, 566, 585 | 94(1)(a) |
349 | 557, 567, 586 | 94(1)(a) |
350 | 558, 568, 587 | 94(1)(a) |
351 | Exempt: LPP | |
352 | Exempt: LPP | |
353 | Exempt: LPP | |
354 | Exempt: LPP | |
355 | 549, 559 | 94(1)(a) |
356 | 550, 560 | 94(1)(a) |
357 | 551, 561, 580 | 94(1)(a) |
358 | 552, 562, 581 | 94(1)(a) |
359 | 553, 563, 582 | 94(1)(a) |
360 | 554, 564, 583 | 94(1)(a) |
361 | 555, 565, 584 | 94(1)(a) |
362 | 556, 566, 585 | 94(1)(a) |
363 | 557, 567, 586 | 94(1)(a) |
364 | 558, 568, 587 | 94(1)(a) |
365 | 501 | 94(1)(a) |
366 | 502 | 94(1)(a) |
367 | 503 | 94(1)(a) |
368 | N/A | 94(1)(a) |
369 | Exempt: LPP | |
370 | Exempt: LPP | |
371 | Exempt: LPP | |
372 | 448 | 94(1)(a) |
373 | 449 | 94(1)(a) |
374 | 450 | 94(1)(a) |
375 | 451 | 94(1)(a) |
376 | 452 | 94(1)(a) |
377 | 453 | 94(1)(a) |
378 | 454 | 94(1)(a) |
379 | 455 | 94(1)(a) |
380 | 456 | 94(1)(a) |
381 | 457 | 94(1)(a) |
382 | 458 | 94(1)(a) |
383 | 459 | 94(1)(a) |
384 | 460 | 94(1)(a) |
385 | 461 | 94(1)(a) |
386 | 462 | 94(1)(a) |
387 | 463 | 94(1)(a) |
388 | 464 | 94(1)(a) |
389 | 465 | 94(1)(a) |
390 | 466 | 94(1)(a) |
391 | 467 | 94(1)(a) |
392 | 468 | 94(1)(a) |
393 | 469 | 94(1)(a) |
394 | 481/482 | 94(1)(a) |
395 | 481/482 | 94(1)(a) |
396 | Exempt: LPP | |
397 | Exempt: LPP | |
398 | Exempt: LPP | |
399 | 549, 559 | 94(1)(a) |
400 | 550, 560 | 94(1)(a) |
401 | 551, 561, 580 | 94(1)(a) |
402 | 552, 562, 581 | 94(1)(a) |
403 | 553, 563, 582 | 94(1)(a) |
404 | 554, 564, 583 | 94(1)(a) |
405 | 555, 565, 584 | 94(1)(a) |
406 | 556, 566, 585 | 94(1)(a) |
407 | 557, 567, 586 | 94(1)(a) |
408 | 558, 568, 587 | 94(1)(a) |
409 | Exempt: LPP | |
410 | Exempt: LPP | |
411 | Exempt: LPP | |
412 | Exempt: LPP | |
413 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
414 | Released - not in issue | |
415 | Released - not in issue | |
416 | Released - not in issue | |
417 | Released - not in issue | |
418 | Released - not in issue | |
419 | Released - not in issue | |
420 | Released - not in issue | |
421 | Released - not in issue | |
422 | Released - not in issue | |
423 | Released - not in issue | |
424 | 490 | 94(1)(a) |
425 | 491 | 94(1)(a) |
426 | 492 | 94(1)(a) |
427 | 493 | 94(1)(a) |
428 | 494 | 94(1)(a) |
429 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
430 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
431 | Released - not in issue | |
432 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
433 | Released - not in issue | |
434 | Released - not in issue | |
435 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
436 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
437 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
438 | Released - not in issue | |
439 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
440 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
441 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
442 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
443 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
444 | 438 | 94(1)(a) |
445 | 439 | 94(1)(a) |
446 | 440 | 94(1)(a) |
447 | 441 | 94(1)(a) |
448 | 442 | 94(1)(a) |
449 | 426 | 94(1)(a) |
450 | Exempt: LPP | |
451 |
Segments 1-2: CTPI (Category 3) Segments 3-4: LPP | |
452 |
Segment 1: LPP Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
453 | Released - not in issue | |
454 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
455 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
456 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
457 | Released - not in issue | |
458 | 391 | 94(1)(a) |
459 | 392 | 94(1)(a) |
460 | N/A | 94(1)(a) |
461 | 387 | 94(1)(a) |
462 | 389 | 94(1)(a) |
463 | 381 | 94(1)(a) |
464 | 382 | 94(1)(a) |
465 | 383 | 94(1)(a) |
466 | 355 | 94(1)(a) |
467 | 356 | 94(1)(a) |
468 | 357 | 94(1)(a) |
469 | 358 | 94(1)(a) |
470 | 359 | 94(1)(a) |
471 | 360 | 94(1)(a) |
472 | 361 | 94(1)(a) |
473 | 362 | 94(1)(a) |
474 | 363 | 94(1)(a) |
475 | 345 | 94(1)(a) |
476 | 346 | 94(1)(a) |
477 | 347 | 94(1)(a) |
478 | 348 | 94(1)(a) |
479 | 349 | 94(1)(a) |
480 | N/A | 94(1)(a) |
481 | 499/500; 446/7 | 94(1)(a) |
482 | 499/500; 446/7 | 94(1)(a) |
483 | Exempt: LPP | |
484 | Exempt: LPP | |
485 | Exempt: LPP | |
486 | Exempt: LPP | |
487 | Exempt: LPP | |
488 | Exempt: LPP | |
489 | Exempt: LPP | |
490 | Exempt: LPP | |
491 | Exempt: LPP | |
492 | Exempt: LPP | |
493 | Exempt: LPP | |
494 | Exempt: LPP | |
495 | Exempt: LPP | |
496 | Exempt: LPP | |
497 | Exempt: LPP | |
498 | Released - not in issue | |
499 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
500 | Released - not in issue | |
501 | Part exempt: LPP | |
502 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
503 | Released - not in issue | |
504 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
505 |
Segment 1: 94(1)(a) (name) Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
506 | 91, 260 | 94(1)(a) |
507 | 92, 261 | 94(1)(a) |
508 | 93, 262 | 94(1)(a) |
509 | 94, 263 | 94(1)(a) |
510 | 95, 264 | 94(1)(a) |
511 | 265 | 94(1)(a) |
512 | 266 | 94(1)(a) |
513 | 267 | 94(1)(a) |
514 | 268 | 94(1)(a) |
515 | 269 | 94(1)(a) |
516 | 270 | 94(1)(a) |
517 | Exempt: LPP | |
518 | Exempt: LPP | |
519 | Exempt: LPP | |
520 | Exempt: LPP | |
521 | Exempt: LPP | |
522 | Exempt: LPP | |
523 | Exempt: LPP | |
524 | Exempt: LPP | |
525 | Exempt: LPP | |
526 | 256 | 94(1)(a) |
527 | 157 | 94(1)(a) |
528 | 158 | 94(1)(a) |
529 | 159 | 94(1)(a) |
530 | 160 | 94(1)(a) |
531 | 84, 162 | 94(1)(a) |
532 | 85, 163 | 94(1)(a) |
533 | 86, 164 | 94(1)(a) |
534 | 87, 165 | 94(1)(a) |
535 | 171 | 94(1)(a) |
536 | 172 | 94(1)(a) |
537 | 173 | 94(1)(a) |
538 | 174 | 94(1)(a) |
539 | 175 | 94(1)(a) |
540 | 176 | 94(1)(a) |
541 | 152 | 94(1)(a) |
542 | 153 | 94(1)(a) |
543 | 154 | 94(1)(a) |
544 | 148 | 94(1)(a) |
545 | 149 | 94(1)(a) |
546 | 150 | 94(1)(a) |
547 | 151 | 94(1)(a) |
548 | Released - not in issue | |
549 | Released - not in issue | |
550 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
551 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
552 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
553 | Released - not in issue | |
554 | 142 | 94(1)(a) |
555 | 143 | 94(1)(a) |
556 | 144 | 94(1)(a) |
557 | 145 | 94(1)(a) |
558 | 146 | 94(1)(a) |
559 | 147 | 94(1)(a) |
560 | Exempt: LPP | |
561 | Exempt: LPP | |
562 | Released - not in issue | |
563 | Released - not in issue | |
564 | Part exempt: LPP | |
565 | Released - not in issue | |
566 | Released - not in issue | |
567 | Released - not in issue | |
568 | Released - not in issue | |
569 | Released - not in issue | |
570 | Released - not in issue | |
571 | Released - not in issue | |
572 | Released - not in issue | |
573 | Released - not in issue | |
574 | Released - not in issue | |
575 | Released - not in issue | |
576 | Released - not in issue | |
577 | Released - not in issue | |
578 | Released - not in issue | |
579 | Released - not in issue | |
580 | Released - not in issue | |
581 | Released - not in issue | |
582 | Released - not in issue | |
583 | Released - not in issue | |
584 | Released - not in issue | |
585 | Released - not in issue | |
586 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
587 | Released - not in issue | |
588 | Released - not in issue | |
589 | Released - not in issue | |
590 | Released - not in issue | |
591 | Released - not in issue | |
592 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
593 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
594 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
595 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
596 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
597 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
598 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
599 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
600 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
601 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
602 | 728 | 94(1)(a) |
603 | 729 | 94(1)(a) |
604 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
605 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
606 | Released - not in issue | |
607 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
608 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
609 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
610 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
611 | Released - not in issue | |
612 | Released - not in issue | |
613 | 733-734 | 94(1)(a) |
614 | 733-734 | 94(1)(a) |
615 |
Segments 7-8: CTPI (Category 3) Balance: 94(1)(a) (name) | |
616 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
617 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
618 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
619 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
620 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
621 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
622 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
623 | Released - not in issue | |
624 | Released - not in issue | |
625 | Exempt: LPP | |
626 | Exempt: LPP | |
627 | Exempt: LPP | |
628 | Exempt: LPP | |
629 | Released - not in issue | |
630 | Released - not in issue | |
631 | Released - not in issue | |
632 | Released - not in issue | |
633 | Released - not in issue | |
634 |
Segments 1-2: (94(1)(a) (name) Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
635 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
636 | Exempt: LPP | |
637 | Exempt: LPP | |
638 | Exempt: LPP | |
639 | Exempt: LPP | |
640 | Exempt: LPP | |
641 | Exempt: LPP | |
642 | Exempt: LPP | |
643 | Exempt: LPP | |
644 | Exempt: LPP | |
645 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
646 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
647 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
648 | Released - not in issue | |
649 | 728 | 94(1)(a) |
650 | 729 | 94(1)(a) |
651 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
652 |
Segments 1-2: (94(1)(a) (name) Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
653 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
654 | Part exempt: LPP | |
655 | Released - not in issue | |
656 | Released - not in issue | |
657 | Released - not in issue | |
658 | Released - not in issue | |
659 | Released - not in issue | |
660 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
661 |
Segments 1-2: (94(1)(a) (name) Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
662 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
663 | Part exempt: LPP | |
664 | Part exempt: LPP | |
665 | 665-666; 732-734 | 94(1)(a) |
666 | 665-666; 732-734 | 94(1)(a) |
667 | 664-666; 732-734 | 94(1)(a) |
668 | 664-666; 732-734 | 94(1)(a) |
669 | Part exempt: LPP | |
670 | Released - not in issue | |
671 | Released - not in issue | |
672 | Part exempt: LPP | |
673 | Exempt: LPP | |
674 | Exempt: LPP | |
675 | Exempt: LPP | |
676 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
677 |
Final segment: 94(1)(a) (name) Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
678 | Released - not in issue | |
679 | 739-742 | 94(1)(a) |
680 | 739-742 | 94(1)(a) |
681 | 739-742 | 94(1)(a) |
682 | 739-742 | 94(1)(a) |
683 | 739-742 | 94(1)(a) |
684 | 739-742 | 94(1)(a) |
685 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
686 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
687 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
688 | Released - not in issue | |
689 | 574, 663 | 94(1)(a) |
690 | 575, 663 | 94(1)(a) |
691 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
692 | Released - not in issue | |
693 | Released - not in issue | |
694 | Part exempt: LPP | |
695 | Released - not in issue | |
696 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
697 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
698 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
699 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
700 | Released - not in issue | |
701 | Exempt: LPP | |
702 | Exempt: LPP | |
703 | Exempt: LPP | |
704 | Exempt: LPP | |
705 | 648 | 94(1)(a) |
706 | 649 | 94(1)(a) |
707 | 650 | 94(1)(a) |
708 | 651 | 94(1)(a) |
709 | 641 | 94(1)(a) |
710 | 642 | 94(1)(a) |
711 | 643 | 94(1)(a) |
712 | 644 | 94(1)(a) |
713 | 645 | 94(1)(a) |
714 | 646 | 94(1)(a) |
715 | 647 | 94(1)(a) |
716 | Released - not in issue | |
717 | Released - not in issue | |
718 | Part exempt: LPP | |
719 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
720 | Exempt: LPP | |
721 | Exempt: LPP | |
722 | Exempt: LPP | |
723 | Exempt: LPP | |
724 | Exempt: LPP | |
725 | 592, 628 | 94(1)(a) |
726 | 593, 629 | 94(1)(a) |
727 | 594, 630 | 94(1)(a) |
728 | 595, 631 | 94(1)(a) |
729 | 623 | 94(1)(a) |
730 | 624 | 94(1)(a) |
731 | 625 | 94(1)(a) |
732 | 626 | 94(1)(a) |
733 | 627 | 94(1)(a) |
734 | Released - not in issue | |
735 | Exempt: LPP | |
736 | Exempt: LPP | |
737 | Exempt: LPP | |
738 | Exempt: LPP | |
739 | Released - not in issue | |
740 | Part exempt: LPP | |
741 | Exempt: LPP | |
742 | Exempt: LPP | |
743 | Exempt: LPP | |
744 | Exempt: LPP | |
745 | Released - not in issue | |
746 | Released - not in issue | |
747 | Released - not in issue | |
748 | Exempt: LPP | |
749 | Exempt: LPP | |
750 | Exempt: LPP | |
751 | Exempt: LPP | |
752 | Exempt: LPP | |
753 | Exempt: LPP | |
754 | Exempt: LPP | |
755 | Exempt: LPP | |
756 | Exempt: LPP | |
757 | Exempt: LPP | |
758 | Exempt: LPP | |
759 | Exempt: LPP | |
760 | Exempt: LPP | |
761 | Exempt: LPP | |
762 | Exempt: LPP | |
763 | Exempt: LPP | |
764 | Exempt: LPP | |
765 | Exempt: LPP | |
766 | Exempt: LPP | |
767 | 599 | 94(1)(a) |
768 | 600 | 94(1)(a) |
769 | 601 | 94(1)(a) |
770 | 602 | 94(1)(a) |
771 | 603 | 94(1)(a) |
772 | 604 | 94(1)(a) |
773 | 605 | 94(1)(a) |
774 | Released - not in issue | |
775 | Released - not in issue | |
776 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
777 | Released - not in issue | |
778 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
779 | Released - not in issue | |
780 | Exempt: LPP | |
781 | Exempt: LPP | |
782 | 551, 561, 580 | 94(1)(a) |
783 | 552, 562, 581 | 94(1)(a) |
784 | 553, 563, 582 | 94(1)(a) |
785 | 554, 564, 583 | 94(1)(a) |
786 | 555, 565, 584 | 94(1)(a) |
787 | 556, 566, 585 | 94(1)(a) |
788 | 557, 567, 586 | 94(1)(a) |
789 | 558, 568, 587 | 94(1)(a) |
790 | Exempt: LPP | |
791 | Exempt: LPP | |
792 | Exempt: LPP | |
793 | Exempt: LPP | |
794 | Exempt: LPP | |
795 | Exempt: LPP | |
796 | 549, 559 | 94(1)(a) |
797 | 550, 560 | 94(1)(a) |
798 | 551, 561, 580 | 94(1)(a) |
799 | 552, 562, 581 | 94(1)(a) |
800 | 553, 563, 582 | 94(1)(a) |
801 | 554, 564, 583 | 94(1)(a) |
802 | 555, 565, 584 | 94(1)(a) |
803 | 556, 566, 585 | 94(1)(a) |
804 | 557, 567, 586 | 94(1)(a) |
805 | 558, 568, 587 | 94(1)(a) |
806 | 739-742 | Part 94(1)(a) |
807 | 739-742 | 94(1)(a) |
808 | 739-742 | 94(1)(a) |
809 | 739-742 | 94(1)(a) |
810 | Exempt: LPP | |
811 | Exempt: LPP | |
812 | Exempt: LPP | |
813 | Exempt: LPP | |
814 | Exempt: LPP | |
815 | Exempt: LPP | |
816 | Exempt: LPP | |
817 | Exempt: LPP | |
818 | Exempt: LPP | |
819 | Exempt: LPP | |
820 | Exempt: LPP | |
821 | Exempt: LPP | |
822 | Exempt: LPP | |
823 | Exempt: LPP | |
824 | Exempt: LPP | |
825 | Exempt: LPP | |
826 | Exempt: LPP | |
827 | Exempt: LPP | |
828 | Exempt: LPP | |
829 | Exempt: LPP | |
830 | Exempt: LPP | |
831 | Exempt: LPP | |
832 | Exempt: LPP | |
833 | Exempt: LPP | |
834 | Exempt: LPP | |
835 | Exempt: LPP | |
836 | Exempt: LPP | |
837 | Exempt: LPP | |
838 | Exempt: LPP | |
839 | Exempt: LPP | |
840 | Exempt: LPP | |
841 | Exempt: LPP | |
842 | Exempt: LPP | |
843 | Exempt: LPP | |
844 | Exempt: LPP | |
845 | Exempt: LPP | |
846 | Exempt: LPP | |
847 | Exempt: LPP | |
848 | Exempt: LPP | |
849 | Exempt: LPP | |
850 | Exempt: LPP | |
851 | Exempt: LPP | |
852 | Exempt: LPP | |
853 | Exempt: LPP | |
854 | Exempt: LPP | |
855 | Exempt: LPP | |
856 | 499/500; 446/7 | 94(1)(a) |
857 | 499/500; 446/7 | 94(1)(a) |
858 | 340 | 94(1)(a) |
859 | 341 | 94(1)(a) |
860 | 342 | 94(1)(a) |
861 | 343 | 94(1)(a) |
862 | 344 | 94(1)(a) |
863 | 334 | 94(1)(a) |
864 | 335 | 94(1)(a) |
865 | 336 | 94(1)(a) |
866 | 337 | 94(1)(a) |
867 | 338 | 94(1)(a) |
868 | 339 | 94(1)(a) |
869 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
870 | 499/500; 446/7 | 94(1)(a) |
871 | 499/500; 446/7 | 94(1)(a) |
872 | Exempt: LPP | |
873 | Exempt: LPP | |
874 | Exempt: LPP | |
875 | Released - not in issue | |
876 | 448 | 94(1)(a) |
877 | 449 | 94(1)(a) |
878 | 450 | 94(1)(a) |
879 | 451 | 94(1)(a) |
880 | 481/482 | 94(1)(a) |
881 | 481/482 | 94(1)(a) |
882 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
883 | Exempt: LPP | |
884 | Exempt: LPP | |
885 | Exempt: LPP | |
886 | Exempt: LPP | |
887 | Exempt: LPP | |
888 | Exempt: LPP | |
889 | Exempt: LPP | |
890 | Exempt: LPP | |
891 | Exempt: LPP | |
892 | Exempt: LPP | |
893 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
894 | 490 | 94(1)(a) |
895 | 491 | 94(1)(a) |
896 | 492 | 94(1)(a) |
897 | 493 | 94(1)(a) |
898 | 494 | 94(1)(a) |
899 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
900 | Released - not in issue | |
901 | Part exempt: LPP | |
902 | Exempt: LPP | |
903 | Exempt: LPP | |
904 | Exempt: LPP | |
905 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
906 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
907 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
908 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
909 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
910 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
911 | Released - not in issue | |
912 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
913 | Released - not in issue | |
914 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
915 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
916 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
917 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
918 | Released - not in issue | |
919 | Released - not in issue | |
920 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
921 | Released - not in issue | |
922 | Released - not in issue | |
923 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
924 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
925 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
926 | Released - not in issue | |
927 |
Segments 1-2: CTPI (Category 2(c)) Segment 3: CTPI (Category 3) | |
928 | 903 | 94(1)(a) |
929 | 904 | 94(1)(a) |
930 | 905 | 94(1)(a) |
931 |
Segments 1-2: CTPI (Category 2(c)) Segment 3: CTPI (Category 3) | |
932 | Released - not in issue | |
933 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
934 | Released - not in issue | |
935 | Part exempt: LPP | |
936 | Exempt: LPP | |
937 | Exempt: LPP | |
938 | Exempt: LPP | |
939 | Exempt: LPP | |
940 |
Segments 1-3: CTPI (Category 3) Segment 4: 94(1)(a) (name) | |
941 | 904 | 94(1)(a) |
942 | Released - not in issue | |
943 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
944 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
945 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
946 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
947 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
948 | Released - not in issue | |
949 |
Segments 1-2: CTPI (Category 3) Segment 3: LPP | |
950 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
951 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
952 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
953 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
954 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
955 | 426 | 94(1)(a) |
956 | Exempt: LPP | |
957 |
Segments 1-2: CTPI (Category 3) Segments 3-4: LPP | |
958 |
Segment 3: LPP Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
959 | Released - not in issue | |
960 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
961 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
962 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
963 | Released - not in issue | |
964 | Exempt: LPP | |
965 | Exempt: LPP | |
966 | Exempt: LPP | |
967 |
Segments 1-3: CTPI (Category 2(a)) Segment 4: CTPI (Category 1) | |
968 | Part CTPI (Category 2(a)) | |
969 |
Segment 1: CTPI (Category 2(a)) Segment 4: CTPI (Category 1) | |
970 | 387 | 94(1)(a) |
971 | 389 | 94(1)(a) |
972 | 903 | 94(1)(a) |
973 | 904 | 94(1)(a) |
974 | 905 | 94(1)(a) |
975 | 902 | 94(1)(a) |
976 | 903 | 94(1)(a) |
977 | 904 | 94(1)(a) |
978 | 905 | 94(1)(a) |
979 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
980 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
981 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
982 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
983 | Released - not in issue | |
984 | 902 | 94(1)(a) |
985 | 903 | 94(1)(a) |
986 | 904 | 94(1)(a) |
987 | 905 | 94(1)(a) |
988 | 906 | 94(1)(a) |
989 | Released - not in issue | |
990 | Exempt: LPP | |
991 | Exempt: LPP | |
992 | Exempt: LPP | |
993 | 381 | 94(1)(a) |
994 | 382 | 94(1)(a) |
995 | 383 | 94(1)(a) |
996 | Released - not in issue | |
997 | Part exempt: LPP | |
998 | Exempt: LPP | |
999 | Exempt: LPP | |
1000 | Released - not in issue | |
1001 | Exempt: LPP | |
1002 | Exempt: LPP | |
1003 | Exempt: LPP | |
1004 | 376 | 94(1)(a) |
1005 | 377 | 94(1)(a) |
1006 | 378 | 94(1)(a) |
1007 | 379 | 94(1)(a) |
1008 |
Segments 1-2: 94(1)(a) (name) Segment 3: CTPI (Category 2(a)) | |
1009 | 360 | 94(1)(a) |
1010 | 361 | 94(1)(a) |
1011 | 362 | 94(1)(a) |
1012 | 363 | 94(1)(a) |
1013 | N/A | 94(1)(a) |
1014 | 896 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) |
1015 | Part CTPI (Category 2(c)) | |
1016 | Released - not in issue | |
1017 | Released - not in issue | |
1018 | Part exempt: LPP | |
1019 | Exempt: LPP | |
1020 | Released - not in issue | |
1021 | 899 | 94(1)(a) |
1022 | 900 | 94(1)(a) |
1023 | 901 | 94(1)(a) |
1024 | N/A | 94(1)(a) |
1025 | 355 | 94(1)(a) |
1026 | 356 | 94(1)(a) |
1027 | 357 | 94(1)(a) |
1028 | 358 | 94(1)(a) |
1029 | 359 | 94(1)(a) |
1030 | 360 | 94(1)(a) |
1031 | 361 | 94(1)(a) |
1032 | 362 | 94(1)(a) |
1033 | 363 | 94(1)(a) |
1034 | 345 | 94(1)(a) |
1035 | 346 | 94(1)(a) |
1036 | 347 | 94(1)(a) |
1037 | 348 | 94(1)(a) |
1038 | 349 | 94(1)(a) |
1039 | N/A | 94(1)(a) |
1040 | Exempt: LPP | |
1041 | Exempt: LPP | |
1042 | 322 | 94(1)(a) |
1043 | 323 | 94(1)(a) |
1044 | 324 | 94(1)(a) |
1045 | 325 | 94(1)(a) |
1046 | 326 | 94(1)(a) |
1047 | 327 | 94(1)(a) |
1048 | Released - not in issue | |
1049 | 314 | 94(1)(a) |
1050 | 315 | 94(1)(a) |
1051 | 316 | 94(1)(a) |
1052 | 317 | 94(1)(a) |
1053 | Released - not in issue | |
1054 | Exempt: LPP | |
1055 | Exempt: LPP | |
1056 | Exempt: LPP | |
1057 | Exempt: LPP | |
1058 | Exempt: LPP | |
1059 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1060 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1061 |
Segments 1-3: 94(1)(a) (name) Segment 4: CTPI (Category 2(a)) | |
1062 | Released - not in issue | |
1063 | Released - not in issue | |
1064 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1065 | Part CTPI (Category 2(a)) | |
1066 | Released - not in issue | |
1067 | Exempt: LPP | |
1068 | Exempt: LPP | |
1069 | Exempt: LPP | |
1070 | Exempt: LPP | |
1071 | Exempt: LPP | |
1072 | Exempt: LPP | |
1073 | 300 | 94(1)(a) |
1074 | 301 | 94(1)(a) |
1075 | 302 | 94(1)(a) |
1076 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1077 | Released - not in issue | |
1078 | Released - not in issue | |
1079 | Released - not in issue | |
1080 | Released - not in issue | |
1081 | Released - not in issue | |
1082 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1083 | Released - not in issue | |
1084 | Released - not in issue | |
1085 | Released - not in issue | |
1086 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1087 | Released - not in issue | |
1088 | Part exempt: LPP | |
1089 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1090 | Released - not in issue | |
1091 |
Segment 1: 94(1)(a) (name) Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
1092 |
Segments 1-2: 94(1)(a) (name) Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
1093 | Released - not in issue | |
1094 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1095 |
Segment 1: 94(1)(a) (name) Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
1096 |
Segments 1-3: 94(1)(a) (name) Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
1097 | Released - not in issue | |
1098 |
Segments 1-4, 9: 94(1)(a) (names) Balance CTPI: Category 3 | |
1099 |
Segments 1-2, 5, 8 : 94(1)(a) (names) Balance CTPI: Category 3 | |
1100 |
Segments 1-2 : 94(1)(a) (names) Balance CTPI: Category 3 | |
1101 | Released - not in issue | |
1102 | Released - not in issue | |
1103 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1104 | Exempt: LPP | |
1105 | Exempt: LPP | |
1106 | Exempt: LPP | |
1107 | Exempt: LPP | |
1108 | Exempt: LPP | |
1109 | Exempt: LPP | |
1110 | Exempt: LPP | |
1111 | Exempt: LPP | |
1112 | Exempt: LPP | |
1113 | Released - not in issue | |
1114 | Released - not in issue | |
1115 | Released - not in issue | |
1116 | Released - not in issue | |
1117 | Released - not in issue | |
1118 | Released - not in issue | |
1119 | 91, 260 | 94(1)(a) |
1120 | 92, 261 | 94(1)(a) |
1121 | 93, 262 | 94(1)(a) |
1122 | 94, 263 | 94(1)(a) |
1123 | 95, 264 | 94(1)(a) |
1124 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1125 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1126 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1127 | Exempt: LPP | |
1128 | Exempt: LPP | |
1129 | Exempt: LPP | |
1130 | Exempt: LPP | |
1131 | Exempt: LPP | |
1132 | Exempt: LPP | |
1133 | Exempt: LPP | |
1134 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1135 | Released - not in issue | |
1136 | Exempt: LPP | |
1137 | Exempt: LPP | |
1138 | Exempt: LPP | |
1139 | Exempt: LPP | |
1140 | Exempt: LPP | |
1141 | Exempt: LPP | |
1142 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1143 | Released - not in issue | |
1144 | Released - not in issue | |
1145 | Released - not in issue | |
1146 | Released - not in issue | |
1147 | Released - not in issue | |
1148 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1149 | Released - not in issue | |
1150 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1151 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1152 | Released - not in issue | |
1153 | Exempt: LPP | |
1154 | Exempt: LPP | |
1155 | Exempt: LPP | |
1156 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1157 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1158 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1159 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1160 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1161 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1162 | Released - not in issue | |
1163 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1164 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1165 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1166 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1167 | Exempt: LPP | |
1168 | Exempt: LPP | |
1169 | Exempt: LPP | |
1170 | Exempt: LPP | |
1171 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1172 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1173 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1174 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1175 | Released - not in issue | |
1176 |
Segments 3, 5-6: CTPI (Category 2(c)) Balance: 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1177 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1178 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1179 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1180 | Released - not in issue | |
1181 | 171 | 94(1)(a) |
1182 | 172 | 94(1)(a) |
1183 | 173 | 94(1)(a) |
1184 | 174 | 94(1)(a) |
1185 | 175 | 94(1)(a) |
1186 | 176 | 94(1)(a) |
1187 | Exempt: LPP | |
1188 | Exempt: LPP | |
1189 | Exempt: LPP | |
1190 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1191 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1192 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1193 | Released - not in issue | |
1194 | Released - not in issue | |
1195 | Released - not in issue | |
1196 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1197 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1198 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1199 | Released - not in issue | |
1200 | Released - not in issue | |
1201 | Released - not in issue | |
1202 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1203 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1204 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1205 | Released - not in issue | |
1206 | Exempt: LPP | |
1207 | Exempt: LPP | |
1208 | Exempt: LPP | |
1209 | Exempt: LPP | |
1210 | Exempt: LPP | |
1211 | Exempt: LPP | |
1212 | Exempt: LPP | |
1213 | Released - not in issue | |
1214 | Part exempt: LPP | |
1215 | Released - not in issue | |
1216 | Released - not in issue | |
1217 | Part exempt: LPP | |
1218 | Part exempt: LPP | |
1219 | Released - not in issue | |
1220 | 129 | 94(1)(a) |
1221 | 130 | 94(1)(a) |
1222 | 131 | 94(1)(a) |
1223 | 132 | 94(1)(a) |
1224 |
Segments 1-2: CTPI (Category 3) Segment 3: LPP | |
1225 | Part exempt: LPP | |
1226 | Released - not in issue | |
1227 | Released - not in issue | |
1228 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1229 | Part exempt: LPP | |
1230 | Part exempt: LPP | |
1231 | Released - not in issue | |
1232 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1233 | Part exempt: LPP | |
1234 | Part exempt: LPP | |
1235 | Released - not in issue | |
1236 | Released - not in issue | |
1237 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1238 |
Segment 1: CTPI (Category 3) Segment 2: LPP | |
1239 | Part exempt: LPP | |
1240 | Released - not in issue | |
1241 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1242 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1243 |
Segments 1-2: CTPI (Category 3) Segment 3: LPP | |
1244 | Part exempt: LPP | |
1245 | Released - not in issue | |
1246 | Released - not in issue | |
1247 | Exempt: LPP | |
1248 | Exempt: LPP | |
1249 | 125 | 94(1)(a) |
1250 | 126 | 94(1)(a) |
1251 | 126 | 94(1)(a) |
1252 | Released - not in issue | |
1253 | Released - not in issue | |
1254 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
1255 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1256 | Released - not in issue | |
1257 | Released - not in issue | |
1258 | Released - not in issue | |
1259 | Released - not in issue | |
1260 | Released - not in issue | |
1261 | Released - not in issue | |
1262 | Released - not in issue | |
1263 | Released - not in issue | |
1264 | Released - not in issue | |
1265 | Released - not in issue | |
1266 | Released - not in issue | |
1267 | Released - not in issue | |
1268 | Released - not in issue | |
1269 | Released - not in issue | |
1270 | Released - not in issue | |
1271 | Released - not in issue | |
1272 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
1273 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1274 | Released - not in issue | |
1275 | Released - not in issue | |
1276 | Released - not in issue | |
1277 | Released - not in issue | |
1278 | Released - not in issue | |
1279 | Released - not in issue | |
1280 | Released - not in issue | |
1281 | Released - not in issue | |
1282 | Released - not in issue | |
1283 | Released - not in issue | |
1284 | Released - not in issue | |
1285 | Released - not in issue | |
1286 | Released - not in issue | |
1287 | Released - not in issue | |
1288 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1289 | Released - not in issue | |
1290 | Released - not in issue | |
1291 | Released - not in issue | |
1292 | Released - not in issue | |
1293 | Released - not in issue | |
1294 | Released - not in issue | |
1295 | Released - not in issue | |
1296 | Released - not in issue | |
1297 | Released - not in issue | |
1298 | Released - not in issue | |
1299 | Released - not in issue | |
1300 | Released - not in issue | |
1301 | Released - not in issue | |
1302 | Released - not in issue | |
1303 | Released - not in issue | |
1304 | Released - not in issue | |
1305 | Released - not in issue | |
1306 | Released - not in issue | |
1307 | Released - not in issue | |
1308 | Released - not in issue | |
1309 | Released - not in issue | |
1310 | Released - not in issue | |
1311 | Released - not in issue | |
1312 | Released - not in issue | |
1313 | Released - not in issue | |
1314 | Released - not in issue | |
1315 | Released - not in issue | |
1316 | Released - not in issue | |
1317 | Released - not in issue | |
1318 | Released - not in issue | |
1319 | Released - not in issue | |
1320 | Released - not in issue | |
1321 | Released - not in issue | |
1322 | Released - not in issue | |
1323 | Released - not in issue | |
1324 | Released - not in issue | |
1325 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1326 | Released - not in issue | |
1327 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1328 | Released - not in issue | |
1329 | 728 | 94(1)(a) |
1330 | 729 | 94(1)(a) |
1331 | Released - not in issue | |
1332 | Released - not in issue | |
1333 | Released - not in issue | |
1334 | Released - not in issue | |
1335 | Released - not in issue | |
1336 | Released - not in issue | |
1337 | Released - not in issue | |
1338 | Released - not in issue | |
1339 | Released - not in issue | |
1340 | Released - not in issue | |
1341 | Released - not in issue | |
1342 | Released - not in issue | |
1343 | Released - not in issue | |
1344 | Released - not in issue | |
1345 | Released - not in issue | |
1346 | Released - not in issue | |
1347 | Released - not in issue | |
1348 | Released - not in issue | |
1349 | Released - not in issue | |
1350 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1351 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1352 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1353 | Released - not in issue | |
1354 | Released - not in issue | |
1355 | Released - not in issue | |
1356 | Released - not in issue | |
1357 | Released - not in issue | |
1358 | Released - not in issue | |
1359 | Released - not in issue | |
1360 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1361 | Released - not in issue | |
1362 | Released - not in issue | |
1363 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1364 | Released - not in issue | |
1365 | Released - not in issue | |
1366 | Released - not in issue | |
1367 | Released - not in issue | |
1368 | Released - not in issue | |
1369 | Released - not in issue | |
1370 | Released - not in issue | |
1371 | Released - not in issue | |
1372 | Released - not in issue | |
1373 | Released - not in issue | |
1374 | Released - not in issue | |
1375 | Released - not in issue | |
1376 | Released - not in issue | |
1377 | Released - not in issue | |
1378 | Released - not in issue | |
1379 | Released - not in issue | |
1380 | Released - not in issue | |
1381 | Released - not in issue | |
1382 | Released - not in issue | |
1383 | Released - not in issue | |
1384 | Released - not in issue | |
1385 | Released - not in issue | |
1386 | Released - not in issue | |
1387 | Released - not in issue | |
1388 | Released - not in issue | |
1389 | Released - not in issue | |
1390 | Released - not in issue | |
1391 | Released - not in issue | |
1392 | Released - not in issue | |
1393 | Released - not in issue | |
1394 | Released - not in issue | |
1395 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
1396 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1397 | Released - not in issue | |
1398 | Released - not in issue | |
1399 | Released - not in issue | |
1400 | Released - not in issue | |
1401 | Released - not in issue | |
1402 | Released - not in issue | |
1403 | Released - not in issue | |
1404 | Released - not in issue | |
1405 | Released - not in issue | |
1406 | Released - not in issue | |
1407 | Released - not in issue | |
1408 | Released - not in issue | |
1409 | Released - not in issue | |
1410 | Released - not in issue | |
1411 | Released - not in issue | |
1412 | Released - not in issue | |
1413 | Released - not in issue | |
1414 | Released - not in issue | |
1415 | Released - not in issue | |
1416 | Released - not in issue | |
1417 | Released - not in issue | |
1418 | Released - not in issue | |
1419 | Released - not in issue | |
1420 | Released - not in issue | |
1421 | Released - not in issue | |
1422 | Released - not in issue | |
1423 | Released - not in issue | |
1424 | Released - not in issue | |
1425 | Released - not in issue | |
1426 | Released - not in issue | |
1427 | Released - not in issue | |
1428 | Released - not in issue | |
1429 | Released - not in issue | |
1430 | Released - not in issue | |
1431 | Released - not in issue | |
1432 | Released - not in issue | |
1433 | Released - not in issue | |
1434 | Released - not in issue | |
1435 | Released - not in issue | |
1436 | Released - not in issue | |
1437 | Released - not in issue | |
1438 | Released - not in issue | |
1439 | Released - not in issue | |
1440 | Released - not in issue | |
1441 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1442 | Released - not in issue | |
1443 | 728 | 94(1)(a) |
1444 | 729 | 94(1)(a) |
1445 | Released - not in issue | |
1446 | Released - not in issue | |
1447 | Released - not in issue | |
1448 | Released - not in issue | |
1449 | Released - not in issue | |
1450 | Released - not in issue | |
1451 | Released - not in issue | |
1452 | Released - not in issue | |
1453 | Released - not in issue | |
1454 | Released - not in issue | |
1455 | Released - not in issue | |
1456 | Released - not in issue | |
1457 | Released - not in issue | |
1458 | Released - not in issue | |
1459 | Released - not in issue | |
1460 | Released - not in issue | |
1461 | Released - not in issue | |
1462 | Released - not in issue | |
1463 | Released - not in issue | |
1464 | Released - not in issue | |
1465 | Released - not in issue | |
1466 | Released - not in issue | |
1467 | Released - not in issue | |
1468 | Released - not in issue | |
1469 | 618 | 94(1)(a) |
1470 | Released - not in issue | |
1471 | Released - not in issue | |
1472 | Released - not in issue | |
1473 | Released - not in issue | |
1474 | Released - not in issue | |
1475 | Released - not in issue | |
1476 | Released - not in issue | |
1477 | Released - not in issue | |
1478 | Released - not in issue | |
1479 | Released - not in issue | |
1480 | Released - not in issue | |
1481 | Part exempt: LPP | |
1482 | Released - not in issue | |
1483 | Released - not in issue | |
1484 | Released - not in issue | |
1485 | Released - not in issue | |
1486 | Released - not in issue | |
1487 | 670, 708 | 94(1)(a) |
1488 | 670, 709 | 94(1)(a) |
1489 | 671, 710 | 94(1)(a) |
1490 | 671, 711 | 94(1)(a) |
1491 | 672, 712 | 94(1)(a) |
1492 | 672, 713 | 94(1)(a) |
1493 | 673, 714 | 94(1)(a) |
1494 | 673, 715 | 94(1)(a) |
1495 | 674, 716 | 94(1)(a) |
1496 | 674, 717 | 94(1)(a) |
1497 | 675, 718 | 94(1)(a) |
1498 | Released - not in issue | |
1499 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
1500 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
1501 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
1502 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
1503 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
1504 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
1505 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
1506 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
1507 | Released - not in issue | |
1508 | Released - not in issue | |
1509 | Released - not in issue | |
1510 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
1511 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
1512 | Released - not in issue | |
1513 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1514 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1515 | Released - not in issue | |
1516 | Released - not in issue | |
1517 | Released - not in issue | |
1518 | Released - not in issue | |
1519 | Released - not in issue | |
1520 | Part CTPI (Category 2(c)) | |
1521 | Part CTPI (Category 2(c)) | |
1522 | Released - not in issue | |
1523 | Part CTPI (Category 2(a)) | |
1524 |
Segment 1: Part CTPI (Category 3) Balance: Part CTPI (Category 2(c)) | |
1525 | Released - not in issue | |
1526 | Released - not in issue | |
1527 | Released - not in issue | |
1528 | Released - not in issue | |
1529 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
1530 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
1531 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
1532 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
1533 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
1534 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
1535 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
1536 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
1537 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
1538 | Full CTPI (Category 4) | |
1539 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1540 | Released - not in issue | |
1541 | 728 | 94(1)(a) |
1542 | 729 | 94(1)(a) |
1543 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1544 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1545 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1546 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1547 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1548 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1549 | Released - not in issue | |
1550 | Released - not in issue | |
1551 | Released - not in issue | |
1552 | Released - not in issue | |
1553 | Released - not in issue | |
1554 | Released - not in issue | |
1555 | Released - not in issue | |
1556 | Released - not in issue | |
1557 | Released - not in issue | |
1558 | Released - not in issue | |
1559 | Released - not in issue | |
1560 | Exempt: LPP | |
1561 | Exempt: LPP | |
1562 | Exempt: LPP | |
1563 | Exempt: LPP | |
1564 | Exempt: LPP | |
1565 | Exempt: LPP | |
1566 | 592 | 94(1)(a) |
1567 | 593 | 94(1)(a) |
1568 | 594 | 94(1)(a) |
1569 | 595 | 94(1)(a) |
1570 | 596 | 94(1)(a) |
1571 | 596 | 94(1)(a) |
1572 | 597 | 94(1)(a) |
1573 | Exempt: LPP | |
1574 | Exempt: LPP | |
1575 | Exempt: LPP | |
1576 | Exempt: LPP | |
1577 | Exempt: LPP | |
1578 | Exempt: LPP | |
1579 | Exempt: LPP | |
1580 | Exempt: LPP | |
1581 | Released - not in issue | |
1582 | Exempt: LPP | |
1583 | Exempt: LPP | |
1584 | Exempt: LPP | |
1585 | Exempt: LPP | |
1586 | Released - not in issue | |
1587 | Released - not in issue | |
1588 | Released - not in issue | |
1589 | Released - not in issue | |
1590 | Released - not in issue | |
1591 | Released - not in issue | |
1592 | Released - not in issue | |
1593 | Released - not in issue | |
1594 | Released - not in issue | |
1595 | Released - not in issue | |
1596 | Released - not in issue | |
1597 | Released - not in issue | |
1598 | Released - not in issue | |
1599 | Released - not in issue | |
1600 | Released - not in issue | |
1601 | 623 | 94(1)(a) |
1602 | 624 | 94(1)(a) |
1603 | 625 | 94(1)(a) |
1604 | 626 | 94(1)(a) |
1605 | 627 | 94(1)(a) |
1606 | 592 | 94(1)(a) |
1607 | 593 | 94(1)(a) |
1608 | 594 | 94(1)(a) |
1609 | 595 | 94(1)(a) |
1610 | 596 | 94(1)(a) |
1611 | 596 | 94(1)(a) |
1612 | 597 | 94(1)(a) |
1613 | Exempt: LPP | |
1614 | Exempt: LPP | |
1615 | Exempt: LPP | |
1616 | Exempt: LPP | |
1617 | Exempt: LPP | |
1618 | Released - not in issue | |
1619 | Released - not in issue | |
1620 | Released - not in issue | |
1621 | Released - not in issue | |
1622 | Released - not in issue | |
1623 | Released - not in issue | |
1624 | Exempt: LPP | |
1625 | Exempt: LPP | |
1626 | Exempt: LPP | |
1627 | Exempt: LPP | |
1628 | Exempt: LPP | |
1629 | Exempt: LPP | |
1630 | 735 | 94(1)(a) |
1631 | 736 | 94(1)(a) |
1632 | 737 | 94(1)(a) |
1633 | 738 | 94(1)(a) |
1634 | 668 | 94(1)(a) |
1635 | 669 | 94(1)(a) |
1636 | 670, 708 | 94(1)(a) |
1637 | 670, 709 | 94(1)(a) |
1638 | 671, 710 | 94(1)(a) |
1639 | 671, 711 | 94(1)(a) |
1640 | 672, 712 | 94(1)(a) |
1641 | 672, 713 | 94(1)(a) |
1642 | 673, 714 | 94(1)(a) |
1643 | 673, 715 | 94(1)(a) |
1644 | 674, 716 | 94(1)(a) |
1645 | 674, 717 | 94(1)(a) |
1646 | 675, 718 | 94(1)(a) |
1647 | 676 | 94(1)(a) |
1648 | 691 | 94(1)(a) |
1649 | 692 | 94(1)(a) |
1650 | 693 | 94(1)(a) |
1651 | 694 | 94(1)(a) |
1652 | 695 | 94(1)(a) |
1653 | 696 | 94(1)(a) |
1654 | 697 | 94(1)(a) |
1655 | 698 | 94(1)(a) |
1656 | 699 | 94(1)(a) |
1657 | 700 | 94(1)(a) |
1658 | 701 | 94(1)(a) |
1659 | 702 | 94(1)(a) |
1660 | 703 | 94(1)(a) |
1661 | 704 | 94(1)(a) |
1662 | 705 | 94(1)(a) |
1663 | 706 | 94(1)(a) |
1664 | 707 | 94(1)(a) |
1665 | Released - not in issue | |
1666 | Released - not in issue | |
1667 | Released - not in issue | |
1668 | Released - not in issue | |
1669 | Released - not in issue | |
1670 | 739-742 |
Segment 1: LPP Segment 2: 94(1)(a) |
1671 | 739-742 | 94(1)(a) |
1672 | 739-742 | 94(1)(a) |
1673 | 739-742 | 94(1)(a) |
1674 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1675 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1676 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1677 | Released - not in issue | |
1678 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1679 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1680 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1681 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1682 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1683 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1684 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1685 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1686 | Released - not in issue | |
1687 | 574, 663 | 94(1)(a) |
1688 | 575, 663 | 94(1)(a) |
1689 | 739-742 | 94(1)(a) |
1690 | 739-742 | 94(1)(a) |
1691 | 739-742 | 94(1)(a) |
1692 | 664-666 | 94(1)(a) |
1693 | 664-666 | 94(1)(a) |
1694 | 664-666 | 94(1)(a) |
1695 | Part exempt: LPP | |
1696 | Released - not in issue | |
1697 | Released - not in issue | |
1698 | Released - not in issue | |
1699 | Released - not in issue | |
1700 | Released - not in issue | |
1701 | Released - not in issue | |
1702 | 664-666 | 94(1)(a) |
1703 | 664-666 | 94(1)(a) |
1704 | 664-666 | 94(1)(a) |
1705 | Part exempt: LPP | |
1706 | Part exempt: LPP | |
1707 | Part exempt: LPP | |
1708 | Released - not in issue | |
1709 | Released - not in issue | |
1710 | Released - not in issue | |
1711 | Released - not in issue | |
1712 | Released - not in issue | |
1713 | Released - not in issue | |
1714 | Released - not in issue | |
1715 | Part exempt: LPP | |
1716 | Released - not in issue | |
1717 | Released - not in issue | |
1718 | Released - not in issue | |
1719 | Released - not in issue | |
1720 | Released - not in issue | |
1721 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1722 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1723 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1724 | 728 | 94(1)(a) |
1725 | 729 | 94(1)(a) |
1726 | Released - not in issue | |
1727 | Released - not in issue | |
1728 | Exempt: LPP | |
1729 | Exempt: LPP | |
1730 | Exempt: LPP | |
1731 | Exempt: LPP | |
1732 | Exempt: LPP | |
1733 | Exempt: LPP | |
1734 | Exempt: LPP | |
1735 | Exempt: LPP | |
1736 | Exempt: LPP | |
1737 | Exempt: LPP | |
1738 | Exempt: LPP | |
1739 | Exempt: LPP | |
1740 | Exempt: LPP | |
1741 | Exempt: LPP | |
1742 | Exempt: LPP | |
1743 | Exempt: LPP | |
1744 | Exempt: LPP | |
1745 | Exempt: LPP | |
1746 | Exempt: LPP | |
1747 | Exempt: LPP | |
1748 | Exempt: LPP | |
1749 | Exempt: LPP | |
1750 | Exempt: LPP | |
1751 | Exempt: LPP | |
1752 | Exempt: LPP | |
1753 | Exempt: LPP | |
1754 | Exempt: LPP | |
1755 | Exempt: LPP | |
1756 | Exempt: LPP | |
1757 | Exempt: LPP | |
1758 | Exempt: LPP | |
1759 | Exempt: LPP | |
1760 | Exempt: LPP | |
1761 | Exempt: LPP | |
1762 | Exempt: LPP | |
1763 | Exempt: LPP | |
1764 | Exempt: LPP | |
1765 | Exempt: LPP | |
1766 | Exempt: LPP | |
1767 | Exempt: LPP | |
1768 | Exempt: LPP | |
1769 | Exempt: LPP | |
1770 | Exempt: LPP | |
1771 | Exempt: LPP | |
1772 | Exempt: LPP | |
1773 | Exempt: LPP | |
1774 | Exempt: LPP | |
1775 | Exempt: LPP | |
1776 | Exempt: LPP | |
1777 | Exempt: LPP | |
1778 | Exempt: LPP | |
1779 | Exempt: LPP | |
1780 | Exempt: LPP | |
1781 | Exempt: LPP | |
1782 | Exempt: LPP | |
1783 | Exempt: LPP | |
1784 | Exempt: LPP | |
1785 | Exempt: LPP | |
1786 | Exempt: LPP | |
1787 | Exempt: LPP | |
1788 | Exempt: LPP | |
1789 | Exempt: LPP | |
1790 |
Segments 7-8: CTPI (Category 3) Balance: 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1791 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1792 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1793 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1794 |
Segments 7-8, 11-12: CTPI (Category 3) Balance: 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1795 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1796 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1797 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1798 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1799 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1800 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1801 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1802 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1803 | Released - not in issue | |
1804 | Released - not in issue | |
1805 | Released - not in issue | |
1806 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1807 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1808 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1809 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1810 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1811 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1812 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1813 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1814 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1815 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1816 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1817 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1818 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1819 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1820 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1821 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1822 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
1823 | Released - not in issue | |
1824 | Released - not in issue | |
1825 | Released - not in issue | |
1826 | Released - not in issue | |
1827 | Released - not in issue | |
1828 | Released - not in issue | |
1829 | Released - not in issue | |
1830 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1831 | Released - not in issue | |
1832 | 381 | 94(1)(a) |
1833 | 382 | 94(1)(a) |
1834 | 383 | 94(1)(a) |
1835 | Exempt: LPP | |
1836 | Exempt: LPP | |
1837 | Exempt: LPP | |
1838 | Released - not in issue | |
1839 |
Segments 2-3, 7: CTPI (Category 3) Balance: 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1840 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1841 | 387 | 94(1)(a) |
1842 | 389 | 94(1)(a) |
1843 | Released - not in issue | |
1844 | 389 | 94(1)(a) |
1845 | Exempt: LPP | |
1846 | Exempt: LPP | |
1847 | Exempt: LPP | |
1848 | Exempt: LPP | |
1849 | 391 | 94(1)(a) |
1850 | 392 | 94(1)(a) |
1851 | N/A | 94(1)(a) |
1852 |
Segments 1-2: CTPI (Category 3) Segments 3-4: LPP | |
1853 |
Segment 1: LPP Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
1854 | Released - not in issue | |
1855 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1856 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1857 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1858 | Released - not in issue | |
1859 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1860 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1861 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1862 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1863 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1864 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1865 | 903, 904 |
Segments 1-3: CTPI (Category 3) Balance: 94(1)(a) |
1866 | 904 | 94(1)(a) |
1867 | 905 | 94(1)(a) |
1868 | Released - not in issue | |
1869 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1870 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1871 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1872 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1873 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1874 | Released - not in issue | |
1875 | Part exempt: LPP | |
1876 | Exempt: LPP | |
1877 | Exempt: LPP | |
1878 | Exempt: LPP | |
1879 | Exempt: LPP | |
1880 | Released - not in issue | |
1881 | Released - not in issue | |
1882 | Part CTPI (Category 2(c)) | |
1883 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1884 |
Segments 1-2: CTPI (Category 2(c)) Segment 3: CTPI (Category 3) | |
1885 | Released - not in issue | |
1886 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1887 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1888 | Released - not in issue | |
1889 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1890 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1891 | Released - not in issue | |
1892 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1893 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
1894 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1895 | Released - not in issue | |
1896 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
1897 | Released - not in issue | |
1898 | 549, 559 | 94(1)(a) |
1899 | 550, 560 | 94(1)(a) |
1900 | 551, 561 | 94(1)(a) |
1901 | 552, 562 | 94(1)(a) |
1902 | 553, 563 | 94(1)(a) |
1903 | 554, 564 | 94(1)(a) |
1904 | 555, 565 | 94(1)(a) |
1905 | 556, 566 | 94(1)(a) |
1906 | 557, 567 | 94(1)(a) |
1907 | 558, 568 | 94(1)(a) |
1908 | 490 | 94(1)(a) |
1909 | 491 | 94(1)(a) |
1910 | 492 | 94(1)(a) |
1911 | 493 | 94(1)(a) |
1912 | 494 | 94(1)(a) |
1913 | Exempt: LPP | |
1914 | Exempt: LPP | |
1915 | Exempt: LPP | |
1916 | Exempt: LPP | |
1917 | Exempt: LPP | |
1918 | Exempt: LPP | |
1919 | Exempt: LPP | |
1920 | 549, 559 | 94(1)(a) |
1921 | 550, 560 | 94(1)(a) |
1922 | 551, 561 | 94(1)(a) |
1923 | 552, 562 | 94(1)(a) |
1924 | 553, 563 | 94(1)(a) |
1925 | 554, 564 | 94(1)(a) |
1926 | 555, 565 | 94(1)(a) |
1927 | 556, 566 | 94(1)(a) |
1928 | 557, 567 | 94(1)(a) |
1929 | 558, 568 | 94(1)(a) |
1930 | Exempt: LPP | |
1931 | Exempt: LPP | |
1932 | Exempt: LPP | |
1933 | Exempt: LPP | |
1934 | 448 | 94(1)(a) |
1935 | 449 | 94(1)(a) |
1936 | 450 | 94(1)(a) |
1937 | 451 | 94(1)(a) |
1938 | 452 | 94(1)(a) |
1939 | 453 | 94(1)(a) |
1940 | 454 | 94(1)(a) |
1941 | 455 | 94(1)(a) |
1942 | 456 | 94(1)(a) |
1943 | 457 | 94(1)(a) |
1944 | 458 | 94(1)(a) |
1945 | 459 | 94(1)(a) |
1946 | 460 | 94(1)(a) |
1947 | 461 | 94(1)(a) |
1948 | 462 | 94(1)(a) |
1949 | 463 | 94(1)(a) |
1950 | 464 | 94(1)(a) |
1951 | 465 | 94(1)(a) |
1952 | 466 | 94(1)(a) |
1953 | 467 | 94(1)(a) |
1954 | 468 | 94(1)(a) |
1955 | 469 | 94(1)(a) |
1956 | 501 | 94(1)(a) |
1957 | 502 | 94(1)(a) |
1958 | 503 | 94(1)(a) |
1959 | N/A | 94(1)(a) |
1960 | Released - not in issue | |
1961 | Released - not in issue | |
1962 | Released - not in issue | |
1963 | Released - not in issue | |
1964 | Released - not in issue | |
1965 | Released - not in issue | |
1966 | Released - not in issue | |
1967 | Released - not in issue | |
1968 | Released - not in issue | |
1969 | Released - not in issue | |
1970 | Released - not in issue | |
1971 | Released - not in issue | |
1972 | Released - not in issue | |
1973 | Released - not in issue | |
1974 | Released - not in issue | |
1975 | 544 | 94(1)(a) |
1976 | 545 | 94(1)(a) |
1977 | 546 | 94(1)(a) |
1978 | 504 | 94(1)(a) |
1979 | 505 | 94(1)(a) |
1980 | 506 | 94(1)(a) |
1981 | 507 | 94(1)(a) |
1982 | 508 | 94(1)(a) |
1983 | 509 | 94(1)(a) |
1984 | 510 | 94(1)(a) |
1985 | 511 | 94(1)(a) |
1986 | 512 | 94(1)(a) |
1987 | 513 | 94(1)(a) |
1988 | 514 | 94(1)(a) |
1989 | 515 | 94(1)(a) |
1990 | 516 | 94(1)(a) |
1991 | 517 | 94(1)(a) |
1992 | 518 | 94(1)(a) |
1993 | 519 | 94(1)(a) |
1994 | 520 | 94(1)(a) |
1995 | 521 | 94(1)(a) |
1996 | 522 | 94(1)(a) |
1997 | 523 | 94(1)(a) |
1998 | 524 | 94(1)(a) |
1999 | 525 | 94(1)(a) |
2000 | 526 | 94(1)(a) |
2001 | 527 | 94(1)(a) |
2002 | 528 | 94(1)(a) |
2003 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
2004 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
2005 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
2006 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
2007 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
2008 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
2009 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
2010 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
2011 | Part CTPI (Category 1) | |
2012 | Released - not in issue | |
2013 | Released - not in issue | |
2014 | Released - not in issue | |
2015 | Exempt: LPP | |
2016 | Exempt: LPP | |
2017 | 549, 559 | 94(1)(a) |
2018 | 550, 560 | 94(1)(a) |
2019 | 551, 561, 580 | 94(1)(a) |
2020 | 552, 562, 581 | 94(1)(a) |
2021 | 553, 563, 582 | 94(1)(a) |
2022 | 554, 564, 583 | 94(1)(a) |
2023 | 555, 565, 584 | 94(1)(a) |
2024 | 556, 566, 585 | 94(1)(a) |
2025 | 557, 567, 586 | 94(1)(a) |
2026 | 558, 568, 587 | 94(1)(a) |
2027 | Released - not in issue | |
2028 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
2029 | Exempt: LPP | |
2030 | Exempt: LPP | |
2031 | Exempt: LPP | |
2032 | Exempt: LPP | |
2033 | 551, 561, 580 | 94(1)(a) |
2034 | 552, 562, 581 | 94(1)(a) |
2035 | 553, 563, 582 | 94(1)(a) |
2036 | 554, 564, 583 | 94(1)(a) |
2037 | 555, 565, 584 | 94(1)(a) |
2038 | 556, 566, 585 | 94(1)(a) |
2039 | 557, 567, 586 | 94(1)(a) |
2040 | 558, 568, 587 | 94(1)(a) |
2041 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
2042 | Released - not in issue | |
2043 | Outside Scope | |
2044 | Outside Scope | |
2045 | Outside Scope | |
2046 | Outside Scope | |
2047 | Outside Scope | |
2048 | Outside Scope | |
2049 | Outside Scope | |
2050 | Outside Scope | |
2051 | Outside Scope | |
2052 | 599 | 94(1)(a) |
2053 | 600 | 94(1)(a) |
2054 | 601 | 94(1)(a) |
2055 | 602 | 94(1)(a) |
2056 | 603 | 94(1)(a) |
2057 | 604 | 94(1)(a) |
2058 | 605 | 94(1)(a) |
2059 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
2060 | Released - not in issue | |
2061 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
2062 | Released - not in issue | |
2063 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
2064 | Part exempt: LPP | |
2065 | Part exempt: LPP | |
2066 | Released - not in issue | |
2067 | Exempt: LPP | |
2068 | Part exempt: LPP | |
2069 | Released - not in issue | |
2070 | Released - not in issue | |
2071 | Part exempt: LPP | |
2072 | Part exempt: LPP | |
2073 | Released - not in issue | |
2074 | Exempt: LPP | |
2075 | Part exempt: LPP | |
2076 | Released - not in issue | |
2077 | Part exempt: LPP | |
2078 | Released - not in issue | |
2079 | Released - not in issue | |
2080 | Released - not in issue | |
2081 | Released - not in issue | |
2082 | 140 | 94(1)(a) |
2083 | 141 | 94(1)(a) |
2084 | Exempt: LPP | |
2085 | Exempt: LPP | |
2086 | Exempt: LPP | |
2087 | 142 | 94(1)(a) |
2088 | 143 | 94(1)(a) |
2089 | 144 | 94(1)(a) |
2090 | 145 | 94(1)(a) |
2091 | 146 | 94(1)(a) |
2092 | 147 | 94(1)(a) |
2093 | N/A | 94(1)(a) |
2094 | 148 | 94(1)(a) |
2095 | 149 | 94(1)(a) |
2096 | 150 | 94(1)(a) |
2097 | 151 | 94(1)(a) |
2098 | 152 | 94(1)(a) |
2099 | 153 | 94(1)(a) |
2100 | 154 | 94(1)(a) |
2101 | 171 | 94(1)(a) |
2102 | 172 | 94(1)(a) |
2103 | 173 | 94(1)(a) |
2104 | 174 | 94(1)(a) |
2105 | 175 | 94(1)(a) |
2106 | 176 | 94(1)(a) |
2107 | 162 | 94(1)(a) |
2108 | 163 | 94(1)(a) |
2109 | 164 | 94(1)(a) |
2110 | 165 | 94(1)(a) |
2111 | 166 | 94(1)(a) |
2112 | 167 | 94(1)(a) |
2113 | 168 | 94(1)(a) |
2114 | 160 | 94(1)(a) |
2115 | 157 | 94(1)(a) |
2116 | 158 | 94(1)(a) |
2117 | 159 | 94(1)(a) |
2118 | 83, 256 | 94(1)(a) |
2119 | 157 | 94(1)(a) |
2120 | 158 | 94(1)(a) |
2121 | 159 | 94(1)(a) |
2122 | 83, 256 | 94(1)(a) |
2123 | 81, 155 | 94(1)(a) |
2124 | 82, 156 | 94(1)(a) |
2125 | N/A | 94(1)(a) |
2126 | 83, 256 | 94(1)(a) |
2127 | Exempt: LPP | |
2128 | Exempt: LPP | |
2129 | Exempt: LPP | |
2130 | Exempt: LPP | |
2131 | Exempt: LPP | |
2132 | Exempt: LPP | |
2133 | 265 | 94(1)(a) |
2134 | 266 | 94(1)(a) |
2135 | 267 | 94(1)(a) |
2136 | 268 | 94(1)(a) |
2137 | 269 | 94(1)(a) |
2138 | 270 | 94(1)(a) |
2139 | Exempt: LPP | |
2140 | Exempt: LPP | |
2141 | Exempt: LPP | |
2142 | Exempt: LPP | |
2143 | Exempt: LPP | |
2144 | Exempt: LPP | |
2145 | 83, 256 | 94(1)(a) |
2146 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
2147 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
2148 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
2149 | 257 | 94(1)(a) |
2150 | 258 | 94(1)(a) |
2151 | 259 | 94(1)(a) |
2152 | 91, 260 | 94(1)(a) |
2153 | 92, 261 | 94(1)(a) |
2154 | 93, 262 | 94(1)(a) |
2155 | 94, 263 | 94(1)(a) |
2156 | 95, 264 | 94(1)(a) |
2157 | Part 94(1)(a) (names) | |
2158 |
Segments 1, 5, 6-7: 94(1)(a) (name) Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
2159 |
Segments 2-3: CTPI (Category 3) Balance: 94(1)(a) (name) | |
2160 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
2161 | Exempt: LPP | |
2162 | Exempt: LPP | |
2163 | Exempt: LPP | |
2164 | Exempt: LPP | |
2165 | Exempt: LPP | |
2166 | Exempt: LPP | |
2167 | Exempt: LPP | |
2168 | Exempt: LPP | |
2169 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
2170 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
2171 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
2172 |
Segments 1, 5, 6-7: 94(1)(a) (name) Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
2173 |
Segments 2-3: CTPI (Category 3) Balance: 94(1)(a) (name) | |
2174 |
Segment 1: 94(1)(a) (name) Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
2175 | Released - not in issue | |
2176 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
2177 |
Segment 1: 94(1)(a) (name) Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
2178 |
Segments 1-2: 94(1)(a) (name) Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
2179 | Released - not in issue | |
2180 | Part exempt: LPP | |
2181 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
2182 | Released - not in issue | |
2183 | Part exempt: LPP | |
2184 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
2185 | Released - not in issue | |
2186 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
2187 | Released - not in issue | |
2188 | Released - not in issue | |
2189 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
2190 | Released - not in issue | |
2191 | Released - not in issue | |
2192 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
2193 | Released - not in issue | |
2194 | 303 | 94(1)(a) |
2195 | 304 | 94(1)(a) |
2196 | 305 | 94(1)(a) |
2197 | 306 | 94(1)(a) |
2198 | 307 | 94(1)(a) |
2199 | 308 | 94(1)(a) |
2200 | Released - not in issue | |
2201 | Released - not in issue | |
2202 | Released - not in issue | |
2203 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
2204 | Part CTPI (Category 2(a)) | |
2205 | Exempt: LPP | |
2206 | Exempt: LPP | |
2207 | Exempt: LPP | |
2208 | Exempt: LPP | |
2209 | Exempt: LPP | |
2210 |
Segments 1-4: 94(1)(a) (name) Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
2211 |
Segments 2-3: CTPI (Category 3) Balance: 94(1)(a) (name) | |
2212 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
2213 | Part 94(1)(a) | |
2214 |
Segment 1: 94(1)(a) (name) Segment 2: CTPI (Category 2(a)) | |
2215 | 319 | 94(1)(a) |
2216 | 320 | 94(1)(a) |
2217 | 321 | 94(1)(a) |
2218 | n/a | 94(1)(a) |
2219 | Exempt: LPP | |
2220 | Exempt: LPP | |
2221 | Exempt: LPP | |
2222 | Exempt: LPP | |
2223 | 322 | 94(1)(a) |
2224 | 323 | 94(1)(a) |
2225 | 324 | 94(1)(a) |
2226 | 325 | 94(1)(a) |
2227 | 326 | 94(1)(a) |
2228 | 327 | 94(1)(a) |
2229 | Exempt: LPP | |
2230 | Exempt: LPP | |
2231 | 340 | 94(1)(a) |
2232 | 341 | 94(1)(a) |
2233 | 342 | 94(1)(a) |
2234 | 343 | 94(1)(a) |
2235 | 344 | 94(1)(a) |
2236 | 345 | 94(1)(a) |
2237 | 346 | 94(1)(a) |
2238 | 347 | 94(1)(a) |
2239 | 348 | 94(1)(a) |
2240 | 349 | 94(1)(a) |
2241 | N/A | 94(1)(a) |
2242 | 499/500; 446/7 | 94(1)(a) |
2243 | 499/500; 446/7 | 94(1)(a) |
2244 | 350 | 94(1)(a) |
2245 | 351 | 94(1)(a) |
2246 | 352 | 94(1)(a) |
2247 | 353 | 94(1)(a) |
2248 | 354 | 94(1)(a) |
2249 | 355 | 94(1)(a) |
2250 | 356 | 94(1)(a) |
2251 | 357 | 94(1)(a) |
2252 | 358 | 94(1)(a) |
2253 | 359 | 94(1)(a) |
2254 | Released - not in issue | |
2255 | Part exempt: LPP | |
2256 | Exempt: LPP | |
2257 | Exempt: LPP | |
2258 | 360 | 94(1)(a) |
2259 | 361 | 94(1)(a) |
2260 | 362 | 94(1)(a) |
2261 | 363 | 94(1)(a) |
2262 | Part exempt: LPP | |
2263 | Exempt: LPP | |
2264 | Exempt: LPP | |
2265 | Released - not in issue | |
2266 | Released - not in issue | |
2267 | Released - not in issue | |
2268 | Released - not in issue | |
2269 | Released - not in issue | |
2270 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
2271 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
2272 | Exempt: LPP | |
2273 | Exempt: LPP | |
2274 | Exempt: LPP | |
2275 |
Segment 1: 94(1)(a) (name) Segment 2: CTPI (Category 2(a)) | |
2276 |
Segments 1-2, 5,8: 94(1)(a) (names) Balance CTPI: Category 3 | |
2277 |
Segments 1-2: 94(1)(a) (name) Balance: CTPI (Category 3) | |
2278 | Released - not in issue | |
2279 | Released - not in issue | |
2280 | Part exempt: LPP | |
2281 | Exempt: LPP | |
2282 | Exempt: LPP | |
2283 |
Segment 1: 94(1)(a) (name) Segment 2: CTPI (Category 3) | |
2284 | Exempt: LPP | |
2285 | 549, 559 | 94(1)(a) |
2286 | 550, 560 | 94(1)(a) |
2287 | Exempt: LPP | |
2288 | Exempt: LPP | |
2289 | 551, 561, 580 | 94(1)(a) |
2290 | 552, 562, 581 | 94(1)(a) |
2291 | 553, 563, 582 | 94(1)(a) |
2292 | 554, 564, 583 | 94(1)(a) |
2293 | 555, 565, 584 | 94(1)(a) |
2294 | 556, 566, 585 | 94(1)(a) |
2295 | 557, 567, 586 | 94(1)(a) |
2296 | 558, 568, 587 | 94(1)(a) |
2297 | Released - not in issue | |
2298 | Part exempt: LPP | |
2299 | Released - not in issue | |
2300 | Released - not in issue | |
2301 | Released - not in issue | |
2302 | Released - not in issue | |
2303 | Released - not in issue | |
2304 | Released - not in issue | |
2305 | Released - not in issue | |
2306 | Released - not in issue | |
2307 | Released - not in issue | |
2308 | Released - not in issue | |
2309 | Released - not in issue | |
2310 | Released - not in issue | |
2311 | Released - not in issue | |
2312 | Released - not in issue | |
2313 | Released - not in issue | |
2314 | 687-688 | 94(1)(a) |
2315 | 688-689 | 94(1)(a) |
2316 | 690 | 94(1)(a) |
2317 | 695 | 94(1)(a) |
2318 | 696 | 94(1)(a) |
2319 | 697 | 94(1)(a) |
2320 | 698 | 94(1)(a) |
2321 | 699 | 94(1)(a) |
2322 | 700 | 94(1)(a) |
2323 | 701 | 94(1)(a) |
2324 | 702 | 94(1)(a) |
2325 | 703 | 94(1)(a) |
2326 | 704 | 94(1)(a) |
2327 | 705 | 94(1)(a) |
2328 | 706 | 94(1)(a) |
2329 | 707 | 94(1)(a) |
2330 | 691 | 94(1)(a) |
2331 | 692 | 94(1)(a) |
2332 | 693 | 94(1)(a) |
2333 | 694 | 94(1)(a) |
2334 |
Segments 7-8: CTPI (Category 3) Balance: 94(1)(a) (name) | |
2335 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
2336 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
2337 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
2338 | Released - not in issue | |
2339 | Full CTPI (Category 3) | |
2340 | Released - not in issue | |
2341 |
Segments 1-2: CTPI (Category 3) Segment 3: LPP | |
2342 | Part exempt: LPP | |
2343 | Released - not in issue | |
2344 | Released - not in issue | |
2345 | Released - not in issue | |
2346 | Released - not in issue | |
2347 | Part CTPI (Category 2(a)) | |
2348 | Released - not in issue | |
2349 | 389 | 94(1)(a) |
2350 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
2351 | Released - not in issue | |
2352 | 110, 488 | 94(1)(a) |
2353 | Released - not in issue | |
2354 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
2355 | Released - not in issue | |
2356 | Released - not in issue | |
2357 | Released - not in issue | |
2358 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
2359 | 108, 486 | 94(1)(a) |
2360 | 109, 487 | 94(1)(a) |
2361 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
2362 | Released - not in issue | |
2363 | Released - not in issue | |
2364 | Released - not in issue | |
2365 | Released - not in issue | |
2366 | Released - not in issue | |
2367 | Released - not in issue | |
2368 | Released - not in issue | |
2369 | Released - not in issue | |
2370 | Released - not in issue | |
2371 | Part CTPI (Category 2(c)) | |
2372 | Part 94(1)(a) (name) | |
2373 |
Segment 1: 94(1)(a) Balance: CTPI (Category 2(b)) | |
2374 |
Segment 1: 94(1)(a) Balance: CTPI (Category 2(b)) | |
2375 |
Segment 1: 94(1)(a) Balance: CTPI (Category 2(b)) | |
2376 | Released - not in issue | |
2377 |
Segment 1: 94(1)(a) Balance: CTPI (Category 2(b)) | |
2378 |
Segment 1: 94(1)(a) Balance: CTPI (Category 2(b)) | |
2379 |
Segment 1: 94(1)(a) Balance: CTPI (Category 2(b)) | |
2380 |
Segment 1: 94(1)(a) Balance: CTPI (Category 2(b)) | |
2381 | Released - not in issue | |
2382 | Released - not in issue | |
2383 | Released - not in issue | |
2384 | Released - not in issue | |
2385 | Released - not in issue | |
2386 | Released - not in issue | |
2387 | Part CTPI (Category 2(d)) | |
2388 | Part CTPI (Category 2(d)) | |
2389 | Released - not in issue | |
2390 | Released - not in issue | |
2391 | Released - not in issue | |
2392 | Part CTPI (Category 3) | |
2393 | Released - not in issue | |
2394 | Released - not in issue | |
2395 | Part CTPI (Category 2(a)) | |
2396 | Part CTPI (Category 2(b)) | |
2397 | Part CTPI (Category 2(b)) | |
2398 | Released - not in issue | |
2399 | Released - not in issue | |
2400 | Released - not in issue | |
2401 | Released - not in issue | |
2402 | Released - not in issue | |
2403 | Part CTPI (Category 2(a)) | |
2404 | Released - not in issue | |
2405 | Released - not in issue | |
2406 | Released - not in issue | |
2407 | Part CTPI (Category 2(a)) | |
2408 | Released - not in issue | |
2409 | Released - not in issue | |
2410 | Released - not in issue | |
2411 | Released - not in issue | |
2412 | Released - not in issue | |
2413 | Released - not in issue | |
2414 | Released - not in issue | |
2415 |
Segment 1: CTPI (Category 2(d)) Segment 2: CTPI (Category 2(c)) | |
2416 | Released - not in issue | |
2417 | Released - not in issue | |
2418 | Released - not in issue | |
2419 | Released - not in issue | |
2420 |
Segment 1: CTPI (Category 2(c)) Segment 2: CTPI (Category 2(d)) | |
2421 | Part CTPI (Category 2(c)) | |
2422 | Released - not in issue | |
2423 | Released - not in issue | |
2424 | Released - not in issue | |
2425 | Released - not in issue | |
2426 | Released - not in issue | |
2427 | Part CTPI (Category 2(d)) | |
2428 | 389 | 94(1)(a) |
2429 | Released - not in issue | |
2430 | Released - not in issue | |
2431 | Released - not in issue | |
2432 | Released - not in issue | |
2433 | Released - not in issue | |
2434 | 229; 1233; 1280 | 94(1)(a) |
2435 | 230; 1234; 1281 | 94(1)(a) |
2436 | 231; 1235; 1282 | 94(1)(a) |
2437 | 232; 1236; 1283 | 94(1)(a) |
2438 | 233; 1284 | 94(1)(a) |
2439 | 234; 1285 | 94(1)(a) |
2440 | 235; 1237; 1286 | 94(1)(a) |
2441 | 1238; 1287 | 94(1)(a) |
2442 | 1239; 1288 | 94(1)(a) |
2443 | 1240; 1289 | 94(1)(a) |
2444 | Released - not in issue |
1 Application dated 2 December 2010.
2 External review application dated 4 April 2011, received 5 April 2011.
3 By decision dated 9 February 2012.
4 Underwood and Department of Housing and Public Works; Minister for Housing and Public Works and Information Commissioner (APL075-12), per Justice Cullinane. Three other matters were also remitted by way of this order, all of which have since been finalised by OIC: see Underwood and Minister for Housing and Public Works [2015] QICmr 27 (29 September 2015) (Underwood and Minister), Underwood and Department of Housing and Public Works (No. 1) [2016] QICmr 11 (17 March 2016) (Underwood (No. 1)), and Underwood and Department of Housing and Public Works (No. 2) [2016] QICmr 36 (15 September 2016) (Underwood (No. 2)).
5 Notice of which was given to the applicant by letter from Communities dated 4 April 2011.
6 (1984) 57 ALR 550.
7 At 562.
8 Submissions dated 5 April 2017.
9 A position consistent with that adopted by OIC and explained to the applicant in related reviews: see, for example, Underwood and Minister at [18]-[19], and Underwood (No. 1) at [15]-[16].
10 Section 95(1)(a) of the RTI Act. I advised the applicant of OIC’s discretion in this regard by letter dated 8 September 2016, in reply to a letter from her dated 6 September 2016 concerning procedural matters.
11 (Unreported, Queensland Information Commissioner, 18 May 2012). The applicant’s appeal of this decision to QCAT – APL184-12 – was dismissed on 23 October 2014.
12 Also identified in Appendix 2.
13 See paragraphs [63]-[68] and [69]-[73].
14 Price and Local Government Association of Queensland Inc (S 111/01) (Unreported, Queensland Information Commissioner, 29 June 2001) (Price and LGAQ). This decision concerned section 77(1)(a) of the repealed Freedom of Information Act 1992 (Qld) (FOI Act). I am satisfied that section 77(1)(a) of the FOI Act was the material equivalent of section 94(1)(a) of the RTI Act, differing only in superficial respects. The comments of the Deputy Information Commissioner in Price and LGAQ are therefore applicable in this case.
15 Price and LGAQ, at [15]. The Deputy Information Commissioner went on to note that ‘[i]t is equally vexatious and oppressive to agencies to make repeated applications for the same documents…’: [16]. The notion that frivolous or vexatious conduct may incorporate ‘oppressive’ conduct as alluded to by the Information Commissioner in this passage has been recognised by the Court of Appeal: Mudie v Gainriver Pty Ltd (No 2) [2003] 2 Qd R 271, [36]-[37] (Mudie v Gainriver).
16 Or not to further deal.
17 Such as name of recipient, date of printing for the purposes of generating hard copies to collate in response to the applicant’s applications, and/or in the text of automatically-generated disclaimer ‘boilerplate’. The latter occasionally causes a line break and thus generates an additional page not mirrored in its 310671 equivalent. These extra pages contain nothing more than mere ‘spillover’ of such ‘boilerplate’ text.
18 Adopting the ordinary meaning of the word, which includes ‘of little or no worth, weight or importance’: Mudie v Gainriver, at [35].
19 As asserted by the applicant in submissions made by her in Underwood (No. 2) – see footnote 20 of that decision.
20As in Underwood (No. 1), I have not conducted an exhaustive re-examination of the issues determined in review no. 310671, which, by necessitating a re-hearing of said issues would defeat the purpose of my invoking section 94(1)(a) of the RTI Act, and occasion the very prejudice to OIC and others my decision in this regard is intended to avoid. As in that case, however, I am satisfied that where information was refused in review no. 310671, it was refused on grounds that would apply regardless of which agency – Communities or HPW – held the documents.
21 Identified in the schedule at Appendix 2, together with earlier file and page references.
22 Noted in Appendix 2.
23 Section 23 of the RTI Act.
24 Section 47(3)(a) of the RTI Act.
25 Section 48 and schedule 3, section 7 of the RTI Act.
26 Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Commission of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49; Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2002) 213 CLR 543 at 552.
27 Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd (1997) 188 CLR 501.
28 Brambles Holdings v Trade Practices Commission (No. 3) (1981) 58 FLR 452 at pages 458-459; Komacha v Orange City Council (Unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Rath J, 30 August 1979). Qualifications and exceptions to LPP – such as waiver and improper purpose – may in some cases raise a question as to whether information attracts or remains subject to LPP. There is nothing in any of the material before me to suggest any such qualification or exception applies in this case.
29 As explained at paragraph 26 of Underwood (No. 1), extracted above at paragraph 31.
30 Noting that proceedings in administrative tribunals such as QCAT have been held to attract the privilege: SZHWY v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 159 FCR 1; Re Farnaby and Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission (2007) 97 ALD 788; VCA and Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (2008) 105 ALD 236 (all three decisions concerning proceedings in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal); Cianfrano v Director General, Attorney General's Department [2008] NSWADTAP 10 at [16] (concerning proceedings in the former Administrative Decisions Tribunal of NSW).
31 Sections 47(3)(b) and 49 of the RTI Act. The term public interest refers to considerations affecting the good order and functioning of the community and government affairs for the well-being of citizens. This means that, in general, a public interest consideration is one which is common to all members of, or a substantial segment of, the community, as distinct from matters that concern purely private or personal interests.
32 Section 49(3) of the RTI Act.
33 Insofar as any of that material is relevant, noting my comments at paragraph 21.
34 Schedule 4, part 4, section 6 of the RTI Act.
35 Section 10 and schedule 6 of the RTI Act, and section 12 of the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) (IP Act).
36 Schedule 4, part 3, item 3 of the RTI Act.
37 See Marshall and Department of Police (Unreported, Queensland Information Commissioner, 25 February 2011) at [27] paraphrasing the Australian Law Reform Commission’s definition of the concept in ‘For your information: Australian Privacy Law and Practice’ Australian Law Reform Commission Report No. 108 released 11 August 2008, at paragraph 1.56.
38 Implicit in, for example, the objects of the RTI Act, and the pro-disclosure bias enshrined in section 44 of the RTI Act. I have discussed the application and weighting of this consideration again below in the context of certain other categories of information; however, to avoid any ambiguity, I am content to record that I accept it applies to favour disclosure of all CTPI Information. Given the nature of this information, and the circumstances in which it came into the possession of government, I am satisfied the consideration warrants, at its highest, only moderate weight (and in most cases much lower weight, as I have specified in various instances below).
39 Schedule 4, part 2, item 1 of the RTI Act.
40 Schedule 4, part 2, item 2 of the RTI Act.
41 Schedule 4, part 2, item 19 of the RTI Act.
42 And thus the factor favouring disclosure prescribed in schedule 4, part 2, item 6 of the RTI Act does not arise for consideration in this case, in relation to any of the CTPI Information.
43 And there is therefore no basis to conclude that their disclosure could reasonably be expected to give rise to the factor favouring disclosure in schedule 4, part 2, item 12 of the RTI Act.
44 As alleged at paragraph 1 of the annexure to the applicant’s external review application dated 4 April 2011, and repeated across her submissions in related reviews: see, for example, Underwood and Minister at [64].
45 The OIC decision noted at [66] of my decision in Underwood and Minister is Kiepe and the University of Queensland (Unreported, Queensland Information Commissioner, 1 August 2012), specifically [18]-[21]. The nested passage quoting the Assistant Information Commissioner appears at paragraph [20] of Kiepe.
46 Schedule 4, part 3, item 3 of the RTI Act.
47 Review no. 100103, resulting in the decision in Underwood (No. 2).
48 Under section 47(3)(b) of the RTI Act.
49 Including mobile telephone numbers.
50 Eg, mobile telephone numbers and signatures.
51 And again noting that refusing the applicant access to this information does not deny her any opportunity to have it amended, for the reasons explained at paragraph 53.
52 Schedule 4, part 2, item 1 of the RTI Act.
53 Schedule 4, part 2, item 2 of the RTI Act.
54 Schedule 4, part 2, item 15 of the RTI Act.
55 As it is information about individuals whose identity is apparent or could reasonably be ascertained from the information (eg, mobile telephone numbers, through calling same).
56 Schedule 4, part 4, section 6 of the RTI Act.
57 Schedule 4, part 3, item 3 of the RTI Act.
58 That is, the specific information itself, the applicant’s submissions, and the list of factors favouring disclosure in the public interest set out in schedule 4, part 2 of the RTI Act.
59 It being difficult to see how disclosure of the names of individuals employed outside the public sector could, for example, enhance government accountability or official transparency, and otherwise once again noting that there is no objective material before me to suggest relevant information is fabricated and/or in any way incorrect, out of date, misleading etc so as to support the application of schedule 4, part 2, item 12 of the RTI Act in favour of release.
60 Underwood, at [67].
61 Schedule 4, part 4, section 6 of the RTI Act.
62 Schedule 4, part 3, item 3 of the RTI Act.
63 Noting that I am satisfied that related personal particulars – eg signatures and mobile telephone numbers – comprise personal information for the purposes of the RTI Act, as information about individuals whose identity is apparent or could reasonably be ascertained from the information.
64 Schedule 4, part 2, items 1, 3 and 4 of the RTI Act.
65 That is, material and considerations as identified in paragraphs 49 and 63.
66 There is nothing before me to support any assertion that this information is ‘fabricated’, and nothing to suggest it is anything other than correct, relevant etc (precluding application of schedule 4, part 2, item 12 of the RTI Act). Further, by its very nature, it would not appear to be information disclosure of which might advance public interest considerations favouring disclosure beyond those I have identified above. Additionally, it is plainly not personal information of the applicant that might be the subject of an application by her for its amendment.
67 Schedule 4, part 3, items 2 and 15 of the RTI Act.
68 Schedule 4, part 4, section 7(1)(c) of the RTI Act. The relevant information clearly concerns the business, professional, commercial or financial affairs of relevant entities, as required by schedule 4, part 4, section 7(1)(c)(i) of the RTI Act. A small segment appearing at the bottom of one of the body corporate pages (page 2388) also describes a familial relationship, thus comprising another individual’s personal information and information disclosure of which would prejudice the protection of an individual’s right to privacy. I can identify no public interest considerations of weight sufficient to displace the privacy interests attaching to this information, and thus access to it may in my view be refused under section 47(3)(b) of the RTI Act.
69 Or information which discloses a relationship or proximity to the applicant which could reasonably be expected to identify other individuals.
70 Schedule 4, part 4, section 6 of the RTI Act.
71 Schedule 4, part 3, item 3 of the RTI Act. OIC has previously found that a person’s dealings with an agency concerns a central aspect of their ‘personal sphere’: 0P5BNI and Department of National Parks, Recreation, Sport and Racing (Unreported, Queensland Information Commissioner, 12 September 2013) at [45].
72 As contained in the annexure to her external review application dated 4 April 2011.
73 See, for example, note 43. To repeat, the factor is set out in schedule 4, part 2, item 12 of the RTI Act.
74 See, for example, Underwood (No. 2), at [80].
75 Matthews and Gold Coast City Council (Unreported, Queensland Information Commissioner, 23 June 2011) at [17]-[18].
76 I am further of the view that the applicant is not being denied any right to amend any information. Some of this information is plainly not her personal information (and thus not amenable to amendment – see above), while there is nothing to suggest any of it is inaccurate, incomplete, out of date or misleading, which is a ground for refusing a request for amendment: section 72(1)(a)(i) of the IP Act. I should also make clear that I can, having reviewed relevant material, identify no other factors favouring disclosure in the public interest beyond those discussed above, for reasons analogous to those set out above at paragraphs [49]-[52] and [63]-[64].
77 In the context of the equivalent of the Category 3 information in this review.
78 Set out at [73].
79 At [76].
80 Schedule 4, part 2, item 11 of the RTI Act.
81 Drafts of which were also released during the course of this external review – see, for example, pages 9-13.
82 Remembering that this is a factor favouring disclosure: schedule 4, part 2, item 7 of the RTI Act.
83 Schedule 4, part 4, section 6 of the RTI Act.
84 Schedule 4, part 3, item 3 of the RTI Act.
85 A factor favouring nondisclosure: schedule 4, part 3, item 19 of the RTI Act.
86 Noting that as regards ‘sufficiency of search’ or missing documents claims, an applicant asserting same bears responsibility for establishing that reasonable grounds exist to suspect the existence of missing documents: Gapsa and Public Service Commission [2016] QICmr 6 (11 February 2016) at [15].